Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38733959›Full record

ArticlePublic health2024

Electronic health record reveals community-level cardiometabolic health benefits associated with 10 years of community-based participatory research.

Z Buchanan, S E Hopkins, T K Ryman, M A Austin, H W Wiener, H K Tiwari, J A Klejka, B B Boyer, A E Fohner

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06907524 (Community-Based Preventative Cardiometabolic Screening and Health Coaching- A Prospective Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06907524 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Community-Based Preventative Cardiometabolic Screening and Health Coaching- A Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorRush University Medical CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsCardiovascular Disease Prevention, Cardiometabolic Diseases, Cardiovascular Risk Factor, Cardiovascular Risk ScoreArmsLongitudinal, Individualized Health Coaching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Z BuchananUniversity of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA.
S E HopkinsOregon Health & Science University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Portland, OR, USA; University of Alaska Fairbanks, Center for Alaska Native Health Research, Fairbanks, AK, USA.
T K RymanUniversity of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
M A AustinUniversity of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA.
H W WienerUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Epidemiology, Birmingham, AL, USA.
H K TiwariUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Biostatistics, Birmingham, AL, USA.
J A KlejkaYukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation, Bethel, AK, USA.
B B BoyerOregon Health & Science University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Portland, OR, USA; University of Alaska Fairbanks, Center for Alaska Native Health Research, Fairbanks, AK, USA.
A E FohnerUniversity of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: afohner@uw.edu.

Funding

YUP'IK PERCEPTIONS OF BODY WEIGHT AND DIABETESP20RR016430 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS · PI O'BRIEN, DIANE H. · 2001 to 2011
$23.4M
Pharmacogenetics in Rural and Underserved PopulationsU01GM092676 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BURKE, WYLIE G., THUMMEL, KENNETH E. · 2010 to 2014
$9.9M
Genetics of Obesity in Yup'ik EskimosR01DK074842 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS · PI BOYER, BERT BRANDON · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
Integrated multi-omics approach to identify early protein biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease and cognitive declineK01AG071689 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FOHNER, ALISON ELIZABETH · 2022 to 2025
$488k
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016430NIA NIH HHS K01 AG071689NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK074842NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM092676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile a major goal of community-based participatory research (CBPR) is to improve community health; it is unclear how to measure longstanding success of CBPR.

objectiveWe sought to determine the impact of ongoing CBPR on cardiometabolic health of participating communities, including in people not directly participating in research.

methodsWe used linear mixed-effects modelling with electronic medical records from 2002 to 2012 from the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation, which provides health care to all Alaska Native people in southwestern Alaska, to compare rates of change in cardiometabolic risk factors between communities that did and did not participate in ongoing CBPR beginning in 2003.

resultsWe analysed 1,262,035 medical records from 12,402 individuals from 10 study and 38 control communities. Blood pressure declined faster in study than in control communities: systolic blood pressure (0.04 mmHg/year; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01, 0.08); diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (0.07 mmHg/year; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.09). Body mass index increased 0.04 units/year faster in study communities than in control communities (95% CI: 0.03, 0.05). More study visits were associated with faster reduction of DBP and triglyceride levels in study communities.

conclusionsOngoing CBPR may improve overall cardiometabolic health in communities, perhaps by increasing engagement in health and advocacy.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchElectronic Health RecordsAdultAgedAlaskaAlaska NativesBlood PressureBody Mass IndexCardiometabolic Risk FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAlaska NativeCardiometabolicCommunity-engaged researchLongitudinal

Identifiers

PMID38733959
PMCPMC11176004

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.