ArticleGeroScience2024
Reliable detection of stochastic epigenetic mutations and associations with cardiovascular aging.
Article in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tissue-Level Transcriptomic Entropy Reveals Organ-Specific Aging Patterns and Predicts Cancer Progression.Aging cell · 2026Article
- DNA Methylation Signatures of Cellular Senescence Are Not Reversed by Senolytic Treatment.Aging cell · 2026Article
- A Minimally Invasive Framework Reveals Region-Specific Cerebrovascular Remodeling in Aging Using Intravital Functional Ultrasound Imaging and Ultrasound Localization Microscopy (fUS-ULM).Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Epigenetic clocks and DNA methylation biomarkers of brain health and disease.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Review
- Article
- Chemotherapy-induced acceleration of DNA methylation-based biological age in breast cancer.Epigenetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stochastic epigenetic mutations (SEMs) have been proposed as novel aging biomarkers to capture heterogeneity in age-related DNA methylation changes. SEMs are defined as outlier methylation patterns at cytosine-guanine dinucleotide sites, categorized as hypermethylated (hyperSEM) or hypomethylated (hypoSEM) relative to a reference. Because SEMs are defined by their outlier status, it is critical to differentiate extreme values due to technical noise or data artifacts from those due to real biology. Using technical replicate data, we found SEM detection is not reliable: across 3 datasets, 24 to 39% of hypoSEM and 46 to 67% of hyperSEM are not shared between replicates. We identified factors influencing SEM reliability-including blood cell type composition, probe beta-value statistics, genomic location, and presence of SNPs. We used these factors in a training dataset to build a machine learning-based filter that removes unreliable SEMs, and found this filter enhances reliability in two independent validation datasets. We assessed associations between SEM loads and aging phenotypes in the Framingham Heart Study and discovered that associations with aging outcomes were in large part driven by hypoSEMs at baseline methylated probes and hyperSEMs at baseline unmethylated probes, which are the same subsets that demonstrate highest technical reliability. These aging associations were preserved after filtering out unreliable SEMs and were enhanced after adjusting for blood cell composition. Finally, we utilized these insights to formulate best practices for SEM detection and introduce a novel R package, SEMdetectR, which uses parallel programming for efficient SEM detection with comprehensive options for detection, filtering, and analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.