ArticleOncology letters2024
Exploring the prognostic significance of iron death‑related lncRNAs in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.
Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of non-coding RNA-regulated ferroptosis in colorectal cancer.Cell death discovery · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a significant health challenge globally, with its prognosis associated with the profile of molecular biomarkers. Recently, the role of iron death-associated long non-coding (lnc)RNAs in cancer development has garnered attention; however, their expression patterns and prognostic value in colorectal cancer remain poorly elucidated. The present study aimed to assess the expression levels of iron death-related lncRNAs in colorectal cancer tissues and evaluate their relationship with patient outcomes through a comprehensive meta-analysis. Systematic searches were performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases, to identify studies relevant to the objective of the present study. Selected studies met predetermined inclusion criteria, from which data were extracted. R software version 4.3.1 was used for the meta-analysis, evaluating the association between iron death-related lncRNAs expression and colorectal cancer prognosis. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot analysis, and Begg's and Egger's test. A total of 11 studies, including 3,984 patients with colorectal cancer, were included in the present meta-analysis. The results demonstrated a significant association between iron death-related lncRNAs and tumor stage classification [odds ratio (OR)=2.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.77-2.24]. Notably, a significant association was also revealed between iron death-related lncRNAs and T stage classification in colorectal cancer (OR=1.82; 95% CI, 1.50-2.20). Furthermore, a statistically significant association was demonstrated between iron death-related lncRNAs and lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer (OR=1.31; 95% CI, 1.03-1.66). The findings also highlighted a significant association between iron death-associated lncRNA and distant metastasis in colon cancer (OR=2.04; 95% CI, 1.62-2.56). Moreover, a significant association between iron death-related lncRNAs and risk score in colorectal cancer was revealed (OR=1.75; 95% CI, 1.25-2.46). In conclusion, the findings of the present meta-analysis underscore the potential of high ferroptosis-associated lncRNA expression as an indicator of adverse outcomes in colorectal cancer, suggesting their viability as biomarkers for cancer progression and prognosis. This insight opens potential new avenues for clinical application and further research into colorectal cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.