ArticleACS omega2024
Reconnaissance of Allostery via the Restoration of Native p53 DNA-Binding Domain Dynamics in Y220C Mutant p53 Tumor Suppressor Protein.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Restoration of the Y220C p53 Full-Length Mutant by PK11000: a Molecular Dynamics Study of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Functional heterogeneity of TP53 mutants in venetoclax-resistant AML: mechanisms, clinical implications, and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Network Theory Analysis of Allosteric Drug-Rescue Mechanisms in the Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 Y220C Mutant.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Allosteric regulation of protein dynamics infers a long-range deliberate propagation of information via micro- and macroscale interactions. The Y220C structural mutant is one of the most frequent cancerous p53 mutants. The mutation is distally located from the DNA-binding site of the p53 DNA-binding domain yet causes changes in DNA recognition. This system presents a unique opportunity to examine the allosteric control of mutated proteins under a drug design paradigm. We focus on the key case study of p53 Y220C mutation restoration by a series of new compounds suggested to have Y220C reactivation properties in comparison to our previous findings on the restorative potential of PK11000, a compound studied extensively for reactivation in vitro and in vivo. Previously, we implemented all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and our lab's techniques of MD-Sectors and MD-Markov state models on the wild type, the Y220C mutant, and Y220C with PK11000 to characterize the effector's restorative properties in terms of conformational dynamics and hydrogen bonding. In this study, we turn to probing the effects made by docking the battery of a new but less well-tested set of aminobenzothiazole derivative compounds reported by Baud et al., which show promise of Y220C rescue. We find that while complete and precise reconstitution of p53 WT molecular dynamics may not be observed as was the case with PK11000, dispersed local reconstitution of loop dynamics provides evidence of rescuing effects by aminobenzothiazole derivative
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.