ArticleHeliyon2024
Bioinformatics-based analysis of the dialog between COVID-19 and RSA.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 in early pregnancy may face an increased risk of miscarriage due to immune imbalance at the maternal-fetal interface. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the crosstalk between COVID-19 infection and recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) remain poorly understood. This study aimed to elucidate the transcriptomic molecular dialog between COVID-19 and RSA. Based on bioinformatics analysis, 307 common differentially expressed genes were found between COVID-19 (GSE171110) and RSA (GSE165004). Common DEGs were mainly enriched in ribosome-related and cell cycle-related signaling pathways. Using degree algorithm, the top 10 hub genes (RPS27A, RPL5, RPS8, RPL4, RPS2, RPL30, RPL23A, RPL31, RPL26, RPL37A) were selected from the common DEGs based on their scores. The results of the qPCR were in general agreement with the results of the raw letter analysis. The top 10 candidate drugs were also selected based on P-values. In this study, we provide molecular markers, signaling pathways, and small molecule compounds that may associate COVID-19. These findings may increase the accurate diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.