ReviewCurrent gene therapy2025
Advancements in CRISPR-Based Therapies for Genetic Modulation in Neurodegenerative Disorders.
Review in Current gene therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting Non-Coding RNAs as a Potential Therapeutic and Delivery Strategy Against Neurodegenerative Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Targeting Non-coding RNAs in Neurodegeneration: Advances in Therapeutic RNA Modalities and Next-Gen Delivery Technologies.Current Alzheimer research · 2026Review
- Huntington's chorea: emerging fields in therapeutics (Review).Neurogenetics · 2025Review
- CRISPR in Neurodegenerative Diseases Treatment: An Alternative Approach to Current Therapies.Genes · 2025Review
- Stem cell and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology in Alzheimer's disease therapy: from basic research to clinical innovation.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- Precision Genome Engineering in Human Disease: Expanding Therapeutic Roles of CRISPR Technologies.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodegenerative disorders pose significant challenges in the realm of healthcare, as these conditions manifest in complex, multifaceted ways, often attributed to genetic anomalies. With the emergence of CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) technology, a new frontier has been unveiled in the quest for targeted, precise genetic manipulation. This abstract explores the recent advancements and potential applications of CRISPR-based therapies in addressing genetic components contributing to various neurodegenerative disorders. The review delves into the foundational principles of CRISPR technology, highlighting its unparalleled ability to edit genetic sequences with unprecedented precision. In addition, it talks about the latest progress in using CRISPR to target specific genetic mutations linked to neurodegenerative diseases like Huntington's disease, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and Parkinson's disease. It talks about the most important studies and trials that show how well and safely CRISPR-based therapies work. This shows how this technology can change genetic variants that cause diseases. Notably, the discussion emphasizes the challenges and ethical considerations associated with the implementation of CRISPR in clinical settings, including off-target effects, delivery methods, and long-term implications. Furthermore, the article explores the prospects and potential hurdles in the widespread application of CRISPR technology for treating neurodegenerative disorders. It touches upon the need for continued research, improved delivery mechanisms, and ethical frameworks to ensure responsible and equitable access to these groundbreaking therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38738727What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.