Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38739759›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2024

A comprehensive review of protein-centric predictors for biomolecular interactions: from proteins to nucleic acids and beyond.

Pengzhen Jia, Fuhao Zhang, Chaojin Wu, Min Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Comparative assessment of binding residue predictions in intrinsically disordered regions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pengzhen JiaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, 932 Lushan Road(S), Changsha 410083, China.
Fuhao ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, 932 Lushan Road(S), Changsha 410083, China.
Chaojin WuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, 932 Lushan Road(S), Changsha 410083, China.
Min LiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, 932 Lushan Road(S), Changsha 410083, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0188-1394

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62225209Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province 2021RC0048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins interact with diverse ligands to perform a large number of biological functions, such as gene expression and signal transduction. Accurate identification of these protein-ligand interactions is crucial to the understanding of molecular mechanisms and the development of new drugs. However, traditional biological experiments are time-consuming and expensive. With the development of high-throughput technologies, an increasing amount of protein data is available. In the past decades, many computational methods have been developed to predict protein-ligand interactions. Here, we review a comprehensive set of over 160 protein-ligand interaction predictors, which cover protein-protein, protein-nucleic acid, protein-peptide and protein-other ligands (nucleotide, heme, ion) interactions. We have carried out a comprehensive analysis of the above four types of predictors from several significant perspectives, including their inputs, feature profiles, models, availability, etc. The current methods primarily rely on protein sequences, especially utilizing evolutionary information. The significant improvement in predictions is attributed to deep learning methods. Additionally, sequence-based pretrained models and structure-based approaches are emerging as new trends.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyNucleic AcidsProteinsHumansLigandsProtein BindingLigandsNucleic AcidsProteinsprotein–ligand interactionprotein–nucleic acid interactionprotein–other ligands interactionprotein–peptide interactionprotein–protein interaction

Identifiers

PMID38739759
PMCPMC11089422

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.