Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38739941›Full record

ArticleAging and disease2024

A Comprehensive Prediction Model for Futile Recanalization in AIS Patients Post-Endovascular Therapy: Integrating Clinical, Imaging, and No-Reflow Biomarkers.

Shuangfeng Huang, Jiali Xu, Haijuan Kang, Wenting Guo, Changhong Ren, Alexandra Wehbe, Haiqing Song, Qingfeng Ma, Wenbo Zhao, Yuchuan Ding and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shuangfeng HuangDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jiali XuDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Haijuan KangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Fengtai Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Modern Medicine, Beijing, China.
Wenting GuoDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Changhong RenBeijing Key Laboratory of Hypoxic Conditioning Translational Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Alexandra WehbeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Haiqing SongDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qingfeng MaDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wenbo ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuchuan DingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Xunming JiDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Sijie LiDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our study aimed to construct a predictive model for identifying instances of futile recanalization in patients with anterior circulation occlusion acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who achieved complete reperfusion following endovascular therapy. We included 173 AIS patients who attained complete reperfusion, as indicated by a Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scale score of 3. Our approach involved a thorough analysis of clinical factors, imaging biomarkers, and potential no-reflow biomarkers through both univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictors of futile recanalization. The comprehensive model includes clinical factors such as age, presence of diabetes, admission NIHSS score, and the number of stent retriever passes; imaging biomarkers like poor collaterals; and potential no-reflow biomarkers, notably disrupted blood-brain barrier (OR 4.321, 95% CI 1.794-10.405; p = 0.001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; OR 1.095, 95% CI 1.009-1.188; p = 0.030), and D-dimer (OR 1.134, 95% CI 1.017-1.266; p = 0.024). The model demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with a C-index of 0.901 (95% CI 0.855-0.947) and 0.911 (95% CI 0.863-0.954) in the original and bootstrapping validation samples, respectively. Notably, the comprehensive model showed significantly improved predictive performance over models that did not include no-reflow biomarkers, evidenced by an integrated discrimination improvement of 8.86% (95% CI 4.34%-13.39%; p < 0.001) and a categorized reclassification improvement of 18.38% (95% CI 3.53%-33.23%; p = 0.015). This model, which leverages the potential of no-reflow biomarkers, could be especially beneficial in healthcare settings with limited resources. It provides a valuable tool for predicting futile recanalization, thereby informing clinical decision-making. Future research could explore further refinements to this model and its application in diverse clinical settings.

Indexed as

BiomarkersEndovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMedical FutilityMiddle AgedNo-Reflow PhenomenonPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID38739941
PMCPMC11567269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.