Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38742749›Full record

ArticleHERD2024

Nature-Based Design in Stroke Rehabilitation Environments: A Scoping Review.

Belinda Seale, Aaron Davis, Justin Lawson, Louisa Smith, Joanne Watson, Claire Henderson-Wilson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in HERD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Belinda SealeHealth Nature & Sustainability Research Group, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-4118-3964
Aaron DavisUniSA Creative, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1477-7406
Justin LawsonHealth Nature & Sustainability Research Group, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5934-8752
Louisa SmithDisability and Inclusion, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Joanne WatsonDisability and Inclusion, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5015-3492
Claire Henderson-WilsonHealth Nature & Sustainability Research Group, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7826-9788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify, examine, and map the characteristics of knowledge of nature-based design in stroke rehabilitation facilities, examine how research in this field has been conducted and identify gaps in knowledge.

backgroundMany stroke survivors have wide ranging impacts, resulting in long hospital stays to undertake rehabilitation. The physical environment can influence brain recovery; however, there is limited evidence to support the design of effective rehabilitation environments. Conversely, the health benefits available from connection with nature are well established. A nature-based design approach may have benefits and implications for the physical environment of inpatient stroke rehabilitation facilities; however, it is unclear what evidence exists in this field.

methodThis scoping review followed the JBI methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews, with systematic searches of six databases.

resultsTwenty-eight studies were included in the review. Aims and research methods varied widely. Investigations in 19 studies related to gardens and other designed outdoor nature-based environments. Other studies explored natural analogues, nature inside, inside/outside connections, and the natural environment. Findings from the studies were spread across the fields of design, use, exposure to, and engagement in nature-based environments.

conclusionThe characteristics of knowledge underpinning nature-based design in stroke rehabilitation environments are highly diverse, and significant gaps exist in the evidence base. A framework developed during this review for mapping knowledge on the intentions and impacts for spaces and services in this field assisted to identify these gaps and may be applied to other areas of healthcare design research.

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationEnvironment DesignFacility Design and ConstructionGardensHumansNatureRehabilitation Centersbiophilicbrain recoveryevidence-based designrestorative environmenttherapeutic environment

Identifiers

PMID38742749
PMCPMC11608514

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.