ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
Method for the Enrichment of N
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacological METTL3 inhibition attenuates HIV-1 latency reversal in CD4Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Elevated mBMC cancer · 2026Article
- Pharmacological METTL3 inhibition attenuates HIV-1 latency reversal in CD4bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Elevated m 6 A RNA Modifications Associate with Immune Dysregulation and Cancer in People with HIV-1.Research square · 2026Article
- Epitranscriptomic mmBio · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
N
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.