Evidence mapPaperPMID 38744804Full record

Trial reportSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024

Validation of the Sleepiz One + as a radar-based sensor for contactless diagnosis of sleep apnea.

Jonas Alexander Gross-Isselmann, Torsten Eggert, Alina Wildenauer, Sarah Dietz-Terjung, Martina Grosse Sundrup, Christoph Schoebel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation StudyClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04670848 (Validation of a Contactless Sensor for Sleep Apnea Diagnosis Against Polysomnography), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04670848 nacompletednot on this map

Validation of a Contactless Sensor for Sleep Apnea Diagnosis Against Polysomnography

TypeinterventionalSponsorSleepiz AGRan2020 to 2021Enrolled116ConditionsSleep ApneaArmsSleepiz One+ vs. polysomnography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonas Alexander Gross-IsselmannDevision of Sleep & Telemedicine, Ruhrlandklinik, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. jonas.gross-isselmann@stud.uni-due.de.ORCID 0009-0004-1637-5883
Torsten EggertDevision of Sleep & Telemedicine, Ruhrlandklinik, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2976-105X
Alina WildenauerDevision of Sleep & Telemedicine, Ruhrlandklinik, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5214-3431
Sarah Dietz-TerjungDevision of Sleep & Telemedicine, Ruhrlandklinik, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7907-6670
Martina Grosse SundrupDevision of Sleep & Telemedicine, Ruhrlandklinik, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Christoph SchoebelDevision of Sleep & Telemedicine, Ruhrlandklinik, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0443-2973

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe cardiorespiratory polysomnography (PSG) is an expensive and limited resource. The Sleepiz One + is a novel radar-based contactless monitoring device that can be used e.g. for longitudinal detection of nocturnal respiratory events. The present study aimed to compare the performance of the Sleepiz One + device to the PSG regarding the accuracy of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI).

methodsFrom January to December 2021, a total of 141 adult volunteers who were either suspected of having sleep apnea or who were healthy sleepers took part in a sleep study. This examination served to validate the Sleepiz One + device in the presence and absence of additional SpO2 information. The AHI determined by the Sleepiz One + monitor was estimated automatically and compared with the AHI derived from manual PSG scoring.

resultsThe correlation between the Sleepiz-AHI and the PSG-AHI with and without additional SpO2 measurement was r

conclusionThe Sleepiz One + device is a valid diagnostic tool for patients with moderate to severe OSA. It can also be easily used in the home environment and is therefore beneficial for e.g. immobile and infectious patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION FOR PROSPECTIVELY REGISTERED TRIALS: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04670848) on 2020-12-09.

Indexed as

PolysomnographyRadarSleep Apnea SyndromesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityApneaDiagnosisDigitalizationHigh-frequency electromagnetic fieldsOSASleep monitoring

Identifiers

PMID38744804
PMCPMC11303430

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.