Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38745489›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2024

The association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and cognitive ageing.

Annick P M van Soest, Ondine van de Rest, Renger F Witkamp, Lisette C P G M de Groot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Association of the Planetary Health Diet with dementia risk and brain pathology.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Associations between the EAT-Lancet planetary health diet and incident dementia.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annick P M van SoestDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ondine van de RestDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Renger F WitkampDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Lisette C P G M de GrootDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Agriculture and Innovation KB-15-004-003MCO HealthMinistry of Economic AffairsNCHA (Netherlands Consortium Healthy Ageing)NZOThe Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development 6130.0031Wageningen University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe EAT-Lancet commission has proposed a dietary pattern that is both sustainable and healthy. However, the impact of this diet on cognition in older adults remains unexplored. Therefore, we examined the association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and cognitive ageing.

methodsWe used data from a previous intervention study involving cognitively healthy community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 years. Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was calculated using a recently published index and a 190-item food frequency questionnaire. Global and domain-specific cognitive functioning were assessed at baseline and after 2 years using a neuropsychological test battery. Multivariate-adjusted linear regression was conducted to examine associations between EAT-Lancet diet adherence and cognitive functioning (n = 630) and 2-year change (n = 302).

resultsGreater adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was associated with better global cognitive functioning (β per SD = 3.7 points [95% CI]: 0.04 [0.00, 0.08]) and slower rate of decline (β per SD [95% CI]: 0.05 [0.02, 0.08]). With respect to domain-specific functioning, beneficial associations were observed cross-sectionally for executive functioning (P < 0.01), and longitudinally for change in executive functioning (P < 0.01) and attention and working memory (P < 0.01). The degree of adherence to the EAT-Lancet was not associated with (changes in) information processing speed or episodic memory.

conclusionWe demonstrated that greater adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet is associated with better global cognitive functioning and slower cognitive decline among cognitively healthy older adults. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and assess the potential benefits of the EAT-Lancet diet for the ageing population in a broader context.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive AgingDiet, HealthyExecutive FunctionAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNeuropsychological TestsNutritive ValueProtective FactorsTime Factorsbrain ageinghealthy ageingnutritionolder peopleplanetary health dietplant-based diet

Identifiers

PMID38745489
PMCPMC11094393

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.