Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38745874›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2024

Cognitive decline related to chronic kidney disease as an exclusion factor from kidney transplantation: results from an international survey.

Michele Farisco, Inga A Blumblyte, Casper Franssen, Dorothea Nitsch, Irene Zecchino, Giovambattista Capasso, Gaye Hafez, COST CONNECT Action Collaborators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Diagnosis and Management of Dementia for the Nephrology Clinician: A Review.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2025
    Review
  7. The role of the intestinal microbiome in cognitive decline in patients with kidney disease.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Review
  8. Cognitive impairment in kidney transplanted patients.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Review
  9. Care pathways for patients with cognitive impairment and chronic kidney disease.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Review
  10. CONNECT: what has been done and what needs to be done.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michele FariscoDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3298-7829
Inga A BlumblyteDepartment of Nephrology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Casper FranssenDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dorothea NitschUK Renal Registry, UK Kidney Association, Bristol, UK.
Irene ZecchinoDepartment of Science and Technology, University of Sannio, Benevento, Italy.
Giovambattista CapassoDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3469-8614
Gaye HafezDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Altinbas University, Istanbul, Turkey.
COST CONNECT Action Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and hypothesis: There seems to be a lack of consensus on the necessity and the modality of psychological and specifically cognitive assessment of candidates for kidney transplantation. Both points are often delegated to individual hospitals/centres, whereas international guidelines are inconsistent. We think it is essential to investigate professionals' opinions to advance towards a consistent clinical practice. Methods: This paper presents the results of an international survey among clinical professionals, mainly nephrologists from the CONNECT (Cognitive decline in Nephro-Neurology: European Cooperative Target) network and beyond (i.e. from personal contacts of CONNECT members). The survey investigated their opinions about the question of whether cognitive decline in patients with chronic kidney disease may affect their eligibility for kidney transplantation. Results: Our results show that most clinicians working with patients affected by chronic kidney disease think that cognitive decline may challenge their eligibility for transplantation despite data that suggest that, in some patients, cognitive problems improve after kidney transplantation. Conclusion: We conclude that three needs emerge as particularly pressing: defining agreed-on standards for a multifaceted and multifactorial assessment (i.e. including both clinical/medical and psychosocial factors) of candidates with chronic kidney disease to kidney transplantation; further investigating empirically the causal connection between chronic kidney disease and cognition; and further investigating empirically the possible partial reversibility of cognitive decline after kidney transplantation.

Indexed as

brainchronic kidney diseasecognitive impairmentethicskidney transplantation

Identifiers

PMID38745874
PMCPMC11092267

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.