ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2024
SEnSCA: Identifying possible ligand-receptor interactions and its application in cell-cell communication inference.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SEnSCA: Identifying possible ligand-receptor interactions and its application in cell-cell communication inference.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multicellular organisms have dense affinity with the coordination of cellular activities, which severely depend on communication across diverse cell types. Cell-cell communication (CCC) is often mediated via ligand-receptor interactions (LRIs). Existing CCC inference methods are limited to known LRIs. To address this problem, we developed a comprehensive CCC analysis tool SEnSCA by integrating single cell RNA sequencing and proteome data. SEnSCA mainly contains potential LRI acquisition and CCC strength evaluation. For acquiring potential LRIs, it first extracts LRI features and reduces the feature dimension, subsequently constructs negative LRI samples through K-means clustering, finally acquires potential LRIs based on Stacking ensemble comprising support vector machine, 1D-convolutional neural networks and multi-head attention mechanism. During CCC strength evaluation, SEnSCA conducts LRI filtering and then infers CCC by combining the three-point estimation approach and single cell RNA sequencing data. SEnSCA computed better precision, recall, accuracy, F1 score, AUC and AUPR under most of conditions when predicting possible LRIs. To better illustrate the inferred CCC network, SEnSCA provided three visualization options: heatmap, bubble diagram and network diagram. Its application on human melanoma tissue demonstrated its reliability in CCC detection. In summary, SEnSCA offers a useful CCC inference tool and is freely available at https://github.com/plhhnu/SEnSCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.