ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Establishing Standardization Guidelines For Finite-Element Optomechanical Simulations of Refractive Laser Surgeries: An Application to Photorefractive Keratectomy.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unraveling the impact of laser refractive surgery on corneal ectasia: anFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Computational models can help clinicians plan surgeries by accounting for factors such as mechanical imbalances or testing different surgical techniques beforehand. Different levels of modeling complexity are found in the literature, and it is still not clear what aspects should be included to obtain accurate results in finite-element (FE) corneal models. This work presents a methodology to narrow down minimal requirements of modeling features to report clinical data for a refractive intervention such as PRK. Methods: A pipeline to create FE models of a refractive surgery is presented: It tests different geometries, boundary conditions, loading, and mesh size on the optomechanical simulation output. The mechanical model for the corneal tissue accounts for the collagen fiber distribution in human corneas. Both mechanical and optical outcome are analyzed for the different models. Finally, the methodology is applied to five patient-specific models to ensure accuracy. Results: To simulate the postsurgical corneal optomechanics, our results suggest that the most precise outcome is obtained with patient-specific models with a 100 µm mesh size, sliding boundary condition at the limbus, and intraocular pressure enforced as a distributed load. Conclusions: A methodology for laser surgery simulation has been developed that is able to reproduce the optical target of the laser intervention while also analyzing the mechanical outcome. Translational Relevance: The lack of standardization in modeling refractive interventions leads to different simulation strategies, making difficult to compare them against other publications. This work establishes the standardization guidelines to be followed when performing optomechanical simulations of refractive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.