Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38748707›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A shifting terrain: Understanding the perspectives of walk-in physicians on their roles amid worsening primary care access in Ontario, Canada.

Braeden A Terpou, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, Ruoxi Wang, Danielle Martin, Mina Tadrous, Sacha Bhatia, Jennifer Shuldiner, Simon Berthelot, Niels Thakkar, Kerry McBrien and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Government partnerships with corporate virtual primary care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  6. Impact of changes in primary care attachment: a scoping review.Family medicine and community health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Braeden A TerpouInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6770-2715
Lauren Lapointe-ShawDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University Health Network and Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ruoxi WangInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Danielle MartinInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mina TadrousWomen's College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1911-6129
Sacha BhatiaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer ShuldinerWomen's College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Simon BerthelotDépartement de Médecine de Famille et de Médecine D'urgence, Université Laval, Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Niels ThakkarCollege of Nurses of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kerry McBrienDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Christine SalahubSupports, Systems and Outcomes Department, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tara KiranInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Noah IversInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2500-2435
Laura DesveauxInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3429-1865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-quality primary care is associated with better health outcomes and more efficient and equitable health system performance. However, the rate of primary care attachment is falling, and timely access to primary care is worsening, driving many patients to use walk-in clinics for their comprehensive primary care needs. This study sought to explore the experiences and perceived roles and responsibilities of walk-in physicians in this current climate. Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with nineteen physicians currently providing walk-in care in Ontario, Canada between May and December 2022.

resultsLimited capacity for continuity and comprehensiveness of care were identified as major sources of professional tension for walk-in physicians. Divergent perspectives on their roles were anchored in how physicians viewed their professional identity. Some saw providing continuous and comprehensive care as an infringement on their professional role; others saw their professional role as more flexible and responsive to population needs. Regardless of their professional identity, participants reported feeling ill-equipped to manage the swell of unattached patients, citing a lack of time, resources, connectivity to the system, and remuneration flexibility. Conclusions: As practice demands of walk-in clinics change, an evolution in the professional roles and responsibilities of walk-in physicians follows. However, the resources, structure, and incentives of walk-in care have not evolved to reflect this, leaving physicians to set their own professional boundaries with patients. This results in increasing variations in care and confusion across the primary care sector around who is responsible for what, when, and how.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPrimary Health CareAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPhysiciansPhysician's Role

Identifiers

PMID38748707
PMCPMC11095764

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.