ArticlePLoS computational biology2024
Identification of Low-Complexity Domains by Compositional Signatures Reveals Class-Specific Frequencies and Functions Across the Domains of Life.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- How do low-complexity domain interactions control transcription?Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
- A composition-matching algorithm, MatchIDR, identifies prion-like domains that localize to stress granules.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- In-Depth Study of Low-Complexity Domains: From Structural Diversity to Disease Mechanisms.Cells · 2025Review
- A Perspective on the Role of Mitochondrial Biomolecular Condensates (mtBCs) in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Evolutionary Links to Bacterial BCs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low-complexity domains (LCDs) in proteins are typically enriched in one or two predominant amino acids. As a result, LCDs often exhibit unusual structural/biophysical tendencies and can occupy functional niches. However, for each organism, protein sequences must be compatible with intracellular biomolecules and physicochemical environment, both of which vary from organism to organism. This raises the possibility that LCDs may occupy sequence spaces in select organisms that are otherwise prohibited in most organisms. Here, we report a comprehensive survey and functional analysis of LCDs in all known reference proteomes (>21k organisms), with added focus on rare and unusual types of LCDs. LCDs were classified according to both the primary amino acid and secondary amino acid in each LCD sequence, facilitating detailed comparisons of LCD class frequencies across organisms. Examination of LCD classes at different depths (i.e., domain of life, organism, protein, and per-residue levels) reveals unique facets of LCD frequencies and functions. To our surprise, all 400 LCD classes occur in nature, although some are exceptionally rare. A number of rare classes can be defined for each domain of life, with many LCD classes appearing to be eukaryote-specific. Certain LCD classes were consistently associated with identical functions across many organisms, particularly in eukaryotes. Our analysis methods enable simultaneous, direct comparison of all LCD classes between individual organisms, resulting in a proteome-scale view of differences in LCD frequencies and functions. Together, these results highlight the remarkable diversity and functional specificity of LCDs across all known life forms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.