Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38751121›Full record

ArticlePlant communications2024

TrG2P: A transfer-learning-based tool integrating multi-trait data for accurate prediction of crop yield.

Jinlong Li, Dongfeng Zhang, Feng Yang, Qiusi Zhang, Shouhui Pan, Xiangyu Zhao, Qi Zhang, Yanyun Han, Jinliang Yang, Kaiyi Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Integrating multi-omics and machine learning for disease resistance prediction in legumes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jinlong LiInformation Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China; National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China.
Dongfeng ZhangInformation Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China; National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China.
Feng YangInformation Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China; National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China.
Qiusi ZhangInformation Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China; National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China.
Shouhui PanInformation Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China; National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China.
Xiangyu ZhaoInformation Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China; National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China.
Qi ZhangInformation Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China; National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China.
Yanyun HanInformation Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China; National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China.
Jinliang YangDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA; Center for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Kaiyi WangInformation Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China; National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China. Electronic address: wangky@nercita.org.cn.
Chunjiang ZhaoInformation Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China; National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China. Electronic address: zhaochunjiang@nercita.org.cn.

Funding

Beijing Postdoctoral Research FoundationSTI2030-Major Projects
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yield prediction is the primary goal of genomic selection (GS)-assisted crop breeding. Because yield is a complex quantitative trait, making predictions from genotypic data is challenging. Transfer learning can produce an effective model for a target task by leveraging knowledge from a different, but related, source domain and is considered a great potential method for improving yield prediction by integrating multi-trait data. However, it has not previously been applied to genotype-to-phenotype prediction owing to the lack of an efficient implementation framework. We therefore developed TrG2P, a transfer-learning-based framework. TrG2P first employs convolutional neural networks (CNN) to train models using non-yield-trait phenotypic and genotypic data, thus obtaining pre-trained models. Subsequently, the convolutional layer parameters from these pre-trained models are transferred to the yield prediction task, and the fully connected layers are retrained, thus obtaining fine-tuned models. Finally, the convolutional layer and the first fully connected layer of the fine-tuned models are fused, and the last fully connected layer is trained to enhance prediction performance. We applied TrG2P to five sets of genotypic and phenotypic data from maize (Zea mays), rice (Oryza sativa), and wheat (Triticum aestivum) and compared its model precision to that of seven other popular GS tools: ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (rrBLUP), random forest, support vector regression, light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), CNN, DeepGS, and deep neural network for genomic prediction (DNNGP). TrG2P improved the accuracy of yield prediction by 39.9%, 6.8%, and 1.8% in rice, maize, and wheat, respectively, compared with predictions generated by the best-performing comparison model. Our work therefore demonstrates that transfer learning is an effective strategy for improving yield prediction by integrating information from non-yield-trait data. We attribute its enhanced prediction accuracy to the valuable information available from traits associated with yield and to training dataset augmentation. The Python implementation of TrG2P is available at https://github.com/lijinlong1991/TrG2P. The web-based tool is available at http://trg2p.ebreed.cn:81.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalNeural Networks, ComputerOryzaZea maysGenotypeMachine LearningPhenotypePlant BreedingTriticumcropgenotype to phenotypemulti-traittransfer learningyield prediction

Identifiers

PMID38751121
PMCPMC11287160

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.