ArticleHemaSphere2024
Immune-monitoring of myelodysplastic neoplasms: Recommendations from the i4MDS consortium.
Article in HemaSphere, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systemic Metabolic Changes in Plasma of Patients with Myelodysplastic Neoplasms and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia.Metabolites · 2026Article
- An Immune Dysfunction Signature Score Predicts Survival in MDS Patients: Insights From a Longitudinal, Multicenter Study.Cancer science · 2026Article
- High frequency of CD95British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Cyclosporine in hematological disorders: mechanisms, clinical practice and emerging advances.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Preclinical efficacy of tasquinimod in myelodysplastic neoplasms: Restoring erythropoiesis and mitigating bone loss.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Reframing-renaming(?)-myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms and clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential.Leukemia · 2026Review
- T lymphocytes and natural killer cells in myelodysplastic syndromes: function, dysfunction, and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- [Diagnostic utility of multiparametric flow cytometric immunophenotyping in myelodysplastic neoplasms].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Review
- Characterization and Clinical Implications of p53 Dysfunction in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Article
- Low-risk MDS-A spotlight on precision medicine forHemaSphere · 2025Review
- Validation of the diagnostic potential of 17 immunophenotypic core markers defined by theHemaSphere · 2025Article
- The immunoregulatory role of monocytes and thrombomodulin in myelodysplastic neoplasms.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
58 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in comprehending myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) have unfolded significantly in recent years, elucidating a myriad of cellular and molecular underpinnings integral to disease progression. While molecular inclusions into prognostic models have substantively advanced risk stratification, recent revelations have emphasized the pivotal role of immune dysregulation within the bone marrow milieu during MDS evolution. Nonetheless, immunotherapy for MDS has not experienced breakthroughs seen in other malignancies, partly attributable to the absence of an immune classification that could stratify patients toward optimally targeted immunotherapeutic approaches. A pivotal obstacle to establishing "immune classes" among MDS patients is the absence of validated accepted immune panels suitable for routine application in clinical laboratories. In response, we formed International Integrative Innovative Immunology for MDS (i4MDS), a consortium of multidisciplinary experts, and created the following recommendations for standardized methodologies to monitor immune responses in MDS. A central goal of i4MDS is the development of an immune score that could be incorporated into current clinical risk stratification models. This position paper first consolidates current knowledge on MDS immunology. Subsequently, in collaboration with clinical and laboratory specialists, we introduce flow cytometry panels and cytokine assays, meticulously devised for clinical laboratories, aiming to monitor the immune status of MDS patients, evaluating both immune fitness and identifying potential immune "risk factors." By amalgamating this immunological characterization data and molecular data, we aim to enhance patient stratification, identify predictive markers for treatment responsiveness, and accelerate the development of systems immunology tools and innovative immunotherapies.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.