Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38758188›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2024

Excess mortality in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020-2022.

Ingeborg Forthun, Christian Madsen, Louise Emilsson, Anton Nilsson, Kasper P Kepp, Jonas Björk, Stein Emil Vollset, Tea Lallukka, Ann Kristin Skrindo Knudsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Reassessing Early COVID-19 Strategies in East Asia: Insights From Japan and Korea.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ingeborg ForthunDepartment of Disease Burden, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8097-6959
Christian MadsenDepartment of Disease Burden, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.
Louise EmilssonGeneral Practice Research Unit (AFE) and Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anton NilssonUnit of Epidemiology, Population Studies and Infrastructures (EPI@LUND), Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5774-7189
Kasper P KeppSection of Biophysical and Biomedicinal Chemistry, DTU Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Jonas BjörkUnit of Epidemiology, Population Studies and Infrastructures (EPI@LUND), Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1883-2000
Stein Emil VollsetInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Tea LallukkaDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3841-3129
Ann Kristin Skrindo KnudsenDepartment of Disease Burden, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

Lund UniversitySweden's Innovation AgencySweden's Innovation Agency 2021-02648Swedish Research Council 2019-00198Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare 2020-00962Vinnova 2021-02648Working Life and Welfare 2020-00962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Nordic countries represent a unique case study for the COVID-19 pandemic due to socioeconomic and cultural similarities, high-quality comparable administrative register data and notable differences in mitigation policies during the pandemic. We aimed to compare weekly excess mortality in the Nordic countries across the three full pandemic years 2020-2022.

methodsUsing data on weekly all-cause mortality from official administrative registers in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, we employed time series regression models to assess mortality developments within each pandemic year, with the period 2010-2019 used as reference period. We then compared excess mortality across the countries in 2020-2022, taking differences in population size and age- and sex-distribution into account. Results were age- and sex-standardized to the Danish population of 2020. Robustness was examined with a variety of sensitivity analyses.

resultsWhile Sweden experienced excess mortality in 2020 [75 excess deaths per 100 000 population (95% prediction interval 29-122)], Denmark, Finland and Norway experienced excess mortality in 2022 [52 (14-90), 130 (83-177) and 88 (48-128), respectively]. Weekly death data reveal how mortality started to increase in mid-2021 in Denmark, Finland and Norway, and continued above the expected level through 2022.

conclusionAlthough the Nordic countries experienced relatively low pandemic excess mortality, the impact and timing of excess mortality differed substantially. These estimates-arguably the most accurate available for any region in capturing pandemic-related excess deaths-may inform future research and policy regarding the complex mortality dynamics in times of a health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19MortalityPandemicsSARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionCause of DeathChildChild, PreschoolDenmarkFemaleFinlandHumans

Identifiers

PMID38758188
PMCPMC11293825

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.