Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760035›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Preferred sources of information on diabetes prevention programmes: a population-based cross-sectional study in Poland.

Justyna Grudziąż-Sękowska, Kuba Sękowski, Jarosław Pinkas, Mateusz Jankowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prevalence and Drivers of Missed Healthcare Appointments in Poland: Insights From a 2025 Survey.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justyna Grudziąż-SękowskaSchool of Public Health, Centrum Medyczne Ksztalcenia Podyplomowego, Warsaw, Poland jgrudziaz@cmkp.edu.pl.
Kuba SękowskiSchool of Public Health, Centrum Medyczne Ksztalcenia Podyplomowego, Warsaw, Poland.
Jarosław PinkasSchool of Public Health, Centrum Medyczne Ksztalcenia Podyplomowego, Warsaw, Poland.
Mateusz JankowskiSchool of Public Health, Centrum Medyczne Ksztalcenia Podyplomowego, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7142-5167

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to analyse preferred sources of information on diabetes prevention programmes and to identify sociodemographic determinants influencing these preferences among adults in Poland.

designA cross-sectional survey was carried out between 15 and 18 September 2023 using a computer-assisted web interview. A self-prepared questionnaire included 10 questions on sources of information on type 2 diabetes prevention.

participantsData were obtained from 1046 adults (18-82 years); 53.4% were females.

resultsMost respondents preferred email communication (46.4%), followed by a doctor or nurse (33.5%), and a letter or leaflet directly delivered to the mailbox (25.8%) for type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) prevention information. Younger respondents were more likely to indicate mass media (OR=1.81, 95% CI=1.12 to 2.95, p=0.01) and digital media (OR=1.65, 95% CI=1.02 to 2.67, p=0.04) as a source of information on DM2 prevention. Those who had higher education (OR=1.51, 95% CI=1.16 to 1.96, p=0.002), as well as those with chronic diseases (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.14 to 1.97, p=0.004), were more likely to indicate digital media. Out of 10 different variables analysed in this study, passive occupational status (OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.04 to 1.96, p=0.03) as well as having chronic diseases (OR=1.51, 95% CI=1.16 to 1.96, p=0.002) were associated with higher odds of indicating healthcare workers as a preferred source of information. Marital status, having children, place of residence, household characteristics and financial status do not significantly decide communication preferences.

conclusionCommunication on DM2 prevention should be adjusted to public preferences and expectations. Tailoring interventions to different demographic groups can enhance outreach and engagement. Email emerged as a popular choice, suggesting the potential of digital communication in preventive health programmes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInformation SourcesMaleMass MediaMiddle AgedPolandSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultdiabetes & endocrinologyhealth educationpreventive medicine

Identifiers

PMID38760035
PMCPMC11103186

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.