ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2024
Metabolomic prediction of severe maternal and newborn complications in preeclampsia.
Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omic insights of preeclampsia and cardiovascular health outcomes.Communications medicine · 2025Review
- ORAI1, FGF23, PP13, palladin, and supervillin as potential biomarkers in late-onset pre-eclampsia: a comparative study in maternal and cord blood.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPreeclampsia (PreE) remains a major source of maternal and newborn complications. Prenatal prediction of these complications could significantly improve pregnancy management.
objectivesUsing metabolomic analysis we investigated the prenatal prediction of maternal and newborn complications in early and late PreE and investigated the pathogenesis of such complications.
methodsSerum samples from 76 cases of PreE (36 early-onset and 40 late-onset), and 40 unaffected controls were collected. Direct Injection Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry combined with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was performed. Logistic regression analysis was used to generate models for prediction of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with PreE. Metabolite set enrichment analysis (MSEA) was used to identify the most dysregulated metabolites and pathways in PreE.
resultsForty-three metabolites were significantly altered (p < 0.05) in PreE cases with maternal complications and 162 metabolites were altered in PreE cases with newborn adverse outcomes. The top metabolite prediction model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.806 (0.660-0.952) for predicting adverse maternal outcomes in early-onset PreE, while the AUC for late-onset PreE was 0.843 (0.712-0.974). For the prediction of adverse newborn outcomes, regression models achieved an AUC = 0.828 (0.674-0.982) in early-onset PreE and 0.911 (0.828-0.994) in late-onset PreE. Profound alterations of lipid metabolism were associated with adverse outcomes.
conclusionPrenatal metabolomic markers achieved robust prediction, superior to conventional markers for the prediction of adverse maternal and newborn outcomes in patients with PreE. We report for the first-time the prediction and metabolomic basis of adverse maternal and newborn outcomes in patients with PreE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.