Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764073›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2024

Breaking barriers: supporting hematopoietic stem cell transplant program through collaborative radiation therapy service from a physically distant center.

Subhas Pandit, Simit Sapkota, Abish Adhikari, Prakriti Karki, Roshani Shrestha, Deepak Suman Jha, Rajan Prajapati, Kanchan Sarga Nyaichyai, Bishesh Sharma Poudyal, Bishal Poudel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Subhas PanditDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Kathmandu Cancer Center, Tathali, Bhaktapur, Nepal. subhaspandit@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8992-5194
Simit SapkotaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Kathmandu Cancer Center, Tathali, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Abish AdhikariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kathmandu Cancer Center, Tathali Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Prakriti KarkiDepartment of Research, Kathmandu Cancer Center, Tathali, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Roshani ShresthaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kathmandu Cancer Center, Tathali Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Deepak Suman JhaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kathmandu Cancer Center, Tathali Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Rajan PrajapatiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kathmandu Cancer Center, Tathali Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Kanchan Sarga NyaichyaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kathmandu Cancer Center, Tathali Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Bishesh Sharma PoudyalClinical Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Civil Service Hospital, Minbhawan, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Bishal PoudelMedical Oncology Unit, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Anjani Kumar JhaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kathmandu Cancer Center, Tathali Bhaktapur, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal body irradiation (TBI) for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) has certain distinct advantages, such as uniform dose distribution and lack of drug resistance, but it is not widely available in resource-constrained settings. To overcome the limitations of in-house radiotherapy services in hematology centers, we evaluated the feasibility of conducting HSCT programs in coordination with two physically distant centers using a reduced-intensity TBI protocol.

methodsThirty-two patients with a median age of 20.5 years were included in the study. Fifteen patients were diagnosed with aplastic anemia, 10 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 3 patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), and 4 patients with other hematological conditions. Conditioning regimens used were fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide in 29 cases, fludarabine-cytarabine ATG in 2 cases, and busulfan plus fludarabine in 1 case. The TBI dose was 3 Gy in 28 cases and 2 Gy in 4 cases. Patients were followed monthly after TBI, and the major toxicities were recorded.

resultsThe median follow-up was 22 months. The most common acute complication was acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which occurred in 15.6% of patients. The major late complications were chronic GVHD (9.3%), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (34.3%), and CMV-induced secondary graft failure (6.2%). Seventy-five percent of patients were alive, 21.9% were dead, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up.

conclusionsHSCT based on TBI is feasible even if the center lacks a radiotherapy facility by coordinating with a remote radiotherapy facility. without compromising the patient's outcome.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTransplantation ConditioningWhole-Body IrradiationAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedVidarabineYoung AdultfludarabineVidarabineConditioning regimenGraft-versus-host diseaseHematopoietic stem cell transplantLow- and middle-income countryLow-dose total body irradiation

Identifiers

PMID38764073
PMCPMC13313829

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.