Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764312›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2024

Genomic prediction of synthetic hexaploid wheat upon tetraploid durum and diploid Aegilops parental pools.

Susanne Dreisigacker, Johannes W R Martini, Jaime Cuevas, Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez, Nerida Lozano-Ramírez, Julio Huerta, Pawan Singh, Leonardo Crespo-Herrera, Alison R Bentley, Jose Crossa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Susanne DreisigackerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3546-5989
Johannes W R MartiniAardevo B.V., Nagele, The Netherlands.
Jaime CuevasUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Quintana Roo, Chetumal, México.
Paulino Pérez-RodríguezColegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillos, Texcoco, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3202-1784
Nerida Lozano-RamírezInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, México.
Julio HuertaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, México.
Pawan SinghInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4610-3120
Leonardo Crespo-HerreraInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, México.
Alison R BentleyAustralian National University, Research School of Biology, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5519-4357
Jose CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9429-5855

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-003439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a globally important food crop, which was domesticated about 8-10,000 years ago. Bread wheat is an allopolyploid, and it evolved from two hybridization events of three species. To widen the genetic base in breeding, bread wheat has been re-synthesized by crossing durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) and goat grass (Aegilops tauschii Coss), leading to so-called synthetic hexaploid wheat (SHW). We applied the quantitative genetics tools of "hybrid prediction"-originally developed for the prediction of wheat hybrids generated from different heterotic groups - to a situation of allopolyploidization. Our use-case predicts the phenotypes of SHW for three quantitatively inherited global wheat diseases, namely tan spot (TS), septoria nodorum blotch (SNB), and spot blotch (SB). Our results revealed prediction abilities comparable to studies in 'traditional' elite or hybrid wheat. Prediction abilities were highest using a marker model and performing random cross-validation, predicting the performance of untested SHW (0.483 for SB to 0.730 for TS). When testing parents not necessarily used in SHW, combination prediction abilities were slightly lower (0.378 for SB to 0.718 for TS), yet still promising. Despite the limited phenotypic data, our results provide a general example for predictive models targeting an allopolyploidization event and a method that can guide the use of genetic resources available in gene banks.

Indexed as

AegilopsGenome, PlantTetraploidyTriticumDiploidyHybridization, GeneticPhenotypePlant BreedingPlant DiseasesPolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID38764312
PMCPMC12806931

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.