ArticleHeliyon2024
Stacking learning based on micro-CT radiomics for outcome prediction in the early-stage of silica-induced pulmonary fibrosis model.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Silicosis is a progressive pulmonary fibrosis disease caused by long-term inhalation of silica. The early diagnosis and timely implementation of intervention measures are crucial in preventing silicosis deterioration further. However, the lack of screening and diagnostic measures for early-stage silicosis remains a significant challenge. In this study, silicosis models of varying severity were established through a single exposure to silica with different doses (2.5mg/mice or 5mg/mice) and durations (4 weeks or 12 weeks). The diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) quantitative analysis was assessed using lung density biomarkers and the lung density distribution histogram, with a particular focus on non-aerated lung volume. Subsequently, we developed and evaluated a stacking learning model for early diagnosis of silicosis after extracting and selecting features from CT images. The CT quantitative analysis reveals that while the lung densitometric biomarkers and lung density distribution histogram, as traditional indicators, effectively differentiate severe fibrosis models, they are unable to distinguish early-stage silicosis. Furthermore, these findings remained consistent even when employing non-aerated areas, which is a more sensitive indicator. By establishing a radiomics stacking learning model based on non-aerated areas, we can achieve remarkable diagnostic performance to distinguish early-stage silicosis, which can provide a valuable tool for clinical assistant diagnosis. This study reveals the potential of using non-aerated lung areas as a region of interest in stacking learning for early diagnosis of silicosis, providing new insights into early detection of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.