ArticleCanadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie2024
Automated segmentation for early detection of uveal melanoma.
Article in Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Differentiation Between Uveal Melanoma and Nevus Based on Fundus Photographs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Deep Learning Optimisation Strategies for Uveal Melanoma Detection Using Ultra-Widefield Photography.Research square · 2026Article
- Review
- Discrepancies between Fundus Photography and Multimodal Imaging in Mapping of Choroidal Tumor Borders.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Histopathological evaluation of orbital and ocular lesions: A cross-sectional study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Automatic classification of uveal melanoma response patterns following ruthenium-106 plaque brachytherapy using ultrasound images and deep convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Uveal Melanoma.Anticancer research · 2025Review
- Unlocking the therapeutic potential of cellular mechanobiology.Science advances · 2025Review
- Uveal Pigmented Lesion Classification, Detection, and Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Tasks.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveUveal melanoma is the most common intraocular malignancy in adults. Current screening and triaging methods for melanocytic choroidal tumours face inherent limitations, particularly in regions with limited access to specialized ocular oncologists. This study explores the potential of machine learning to automate tumour segmentation. We develop and evaluate a machine-learning model for lesion segmentation using ultra-wide-field fundus photography.
methodA retrospective chart review was conducted of patients diagnosed with uveal melanoma, choroidal nevi, or congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigmented epithelium at a tertiary academic medical centre. Included patients had a single ultra-wide-field fundus photograph (Optos PLC, Dunfermline, Fife, Scotland) of adequate quality to visualize the lesion of interest, as confirmed by a single ocular oncologist. These images were used to develop and test a machine-learning algorithm for lesion segmentation.
resultsA total of 396 images were used to develop a machine-learning algorithm for lesion segmentation. Ninety additional images were used in the testing data set along with images of 30 healthy control individuals. Of the images with successfully detected lesions, the machine-learning segmentation yielded Dice coefficients of 0.86, 0.81, and 0.85 for uveal melanoma, choroidal nevi, and congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigmented epithelium, respectively. Sensitivities for any lesion detection per image were 1.00, 0.90, and 0.87, respectively. For images without lesions, specificity was 0.93.
conclusionOur study demonstrates a novel machine-learning algorithm's performance, suggesting its potential clinical utility as a widely accessible method of screening choroidal tumours. Additional evaluation methods are necessary to further enhance the model's lesion classification and diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.