Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38769145›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2024

Tutorial: design, production and testing of oncolytic viruses for cancer immunotherapy.

Shashi Gujar, Jonathan G Pol, Vishnupriyan Kumar, Manuela Lizarralde-Guerrero, Prathyusha Konda, Guido Kroemer, John C Bell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Oncolytic viruses: advanced strategies in cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Antibiotic-driven boosting of oncolytic virotherapy.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Single-cell data-driven design of armed oncolytic virus to boost cooperative innate-adaptive immunity against cancer.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shashi Gujar *Department of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Jonathan G Pol *INSERM, U1138, Paris, France.
Vishnupriyan KumarDepartment of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1800-243X
Manuela Lizarralde-GuerreroINSERM, U1138, Paris, France.ORCID 0009-0004-0737-0941
Prathyusha KondaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6861-4442
Guido KroemerINSERM, U1138, Paris, France. kroemer@orange.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9334-4405
John C BellDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. jbell@ohri.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) represent a novel class of cancer immunotherapy agents that preferentially infect and kill cancer cells and promote protective antitumor immunity. Furthermore, OVs can be used in combination with established or upcoming immunotherapeutic agents, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, to efficiently target a wide range of malignancies. The development of OV-based therapy involves three major steps before clinical evaluation: design, production and preclinical testing. OVs can be designed as natural or engineered strains and subsequently selected for their ability to kill a broad spectrum of cancer cells rather than normal, healthy cells. OV selection is further influenced by multiple factors, such as the availability of a specific viral platform, cancer cell permissivity, the need for genetic engineering to render the virus non-pathogenic and/or more effective and logistical considerations around the use of OVs within the laboratory or clinical setting. Selected OVs are then produced and tested for their anticancer potential by using syngeneic, xenograft or humanized preclinical models wherein immunocompromised and immunocompetent setups are used to elucidate their direct oncolytic ability as well as indirect immunotherapeutic potential in vivo. Finally, OVs demonstrating the desired anticancer potential progress toward translation in patients with cancer. This tutorial provides guidelines for the design, production and preclinical testing of OVs, emphasizing considerations specific to OV technology that determine their clinical utility as cancer immunotherapy agents.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyNeoplasmsOncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic VirusesAnimalsHumansMice

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.