Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38770259›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2024

Evaluating the effectiveness of neurofeedback in chronic pain management: a narrative review.

Pierluigi Diotaiuti, Stefano Corrado, Beatrice Tosti, Giuseppe Spica, Tommaso Di Libero, Anderson D'Oliveira, Alessandra Zanon, Angelo Rodio, Alexandro Andrade, Stefania Mancone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Influence of Anthropometric Height on Oculo-Manual Coordinative Reaction Time.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pierluigi DiotaiutiDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Lazio, Italy.
Stefano CorradoDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Lazio, Italy.
Beatrice TostiDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Lazio, Italy.
Giuseppe SpicaDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Lazio, Italy.
Tommaso Di LiberoDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Lazio, Italy.
Anderson D'OliveiraDepartment of Physical Education, CEFID, Santa Catarina State University, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Alessandra ZanonDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Lazio, Italy.
Angelo RodioDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Lazio, Italy.
Alexandro AndradeDepartment of Physical Education, CEFID, Santa Catarina State University, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Stefania ManconeDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Lazio, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence and impact of chronic pain in individuals worldwide necessitate effective management strategies. This narrative review specifically aims to assess the effectiveness of neurofeedback, an emerging non-pharmacological intervention, on the management of chronic pain. The methodology adopted for this review involves a meticulous search across various scientific databases. The search was designed to capture a broad range of studies related to neurofeedback and chronic pain management. To ensure the quality and relevance of the included studies, strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. These criteria focused on the study design, population, intervention type, and reported outcomes. The review synthesizes the findings from a diverse array of studies, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case reports. Key aspects evaluated include the types of neurofeedback used (such as EEG biofeedback), the various chronic pain conditions addressed (like fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain, and migraines), and the methodologies employed in these studies. The review highlights the underlying mechanisms by which neurofeedback may influence pain perception and management, exploring theories related to neural plasticity, pain modulation, and psychological factors. The results of the review reveal a positive correlation between neurofeedback interventions and improved pain management. Several studies report significant reductions on pain intensity, improved quality of life, and decreased reliance on medication following neurofeedback therapy. The review also notes variations in the effectiveness of different neurofeedback protocols and individual responses to treatment. Despite the promising results, the conclusion of the review emphasizes the need for further research. It calls for larger, well-designed clinical trials to validate the findings, to understand the long-term implications of neurofeedback therapy, and to optimize treatment protocols for individual patients.

Indexed as

chronic painneurofeedbackpain managementpain reductionreviewtreatment effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID38770259
PMCPMC11104502

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.