Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38772999›Full record

ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2024

The effect of bee drone brood on the motility and viability of stallion spermatozoa-an in vitro study.

Michal Lenický, Ewelina Sidor, Lucia Dianová, Filip Tirpák, Nikola Štefunková, Małgorzata Dżugan, Marko Halo, Marko Halo, Tomáš Slanina, Iveta Urban and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michal LenickýInstitute of Applied Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976, Nitra, Slovak Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2830-9411
Ewelina SidorDepartment of Chemistry and Food Toxicology, Institute of Food Technology and Nutrition, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 1a St., 35-601, Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3954-4940
Lucia DianováInstitute of Applied Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976, Nitra, Slovak Republic. xdianova@uniag.sk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0221-3563
Filip TirpákInstitute of Applied Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976, Nitra, Slovak Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9293-9055
Nikola ŠtefunkováInstitute of Applied Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976, Nitra, Slovak Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9145-6972
Małgorzata DżuganDepartment of Chemistry and Food Toxicology, Institute of Food Technology and Nutrition, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 1a St., 35-601, Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1601-6296
Marko HaloInstitute of Applied Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976, Nitra, Slovak Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7059-1841
Marko HaloInstitute of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976, Nitra, Slovak Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4299-1781
Tomáš SlaninaInstitute of Applied Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976, Nitra, Slovak Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8524-2620
Iveta UrbanInstitute of Applied Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976, Nitra, Slovak Republic.
Denis BažányInstitute of Applied Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976, Nitra, Slovak Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3072-2171
Agnieszka GreńInstitute of Biology, Pedagogical University of Krakow, Podchorazych 2, 30-084, Krakow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2383-1096
Shubhadeep RoychoudhuryDepartment of Life Science and Bioinformatics, Assam University, Silchar, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-1852
Eric Rendon SchneirFaculty of Planning, The National University Agraria La Molina, Lima, Peru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9413-2308
Peter MassányiInstitute of Applied Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976, Nitra, Slovak Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4216-0948

Funding

Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja APVV-16-0289Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja APVV-21-0168Kultúrna a Edukacná Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR KEGA 035SPU-4/2023Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV VEGA 1/0304/23Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV VEGA 1/0698/22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bee drone brood is a beehive by-product with high hormonal activity used in natural medicine to treat male infertility. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of drone brood on stallion spermatozoa during a short-term incubation for its potential use in the equine semen extenders. Three different forms of fixed drone brood (frozen (FR), freeze-dried (FD), and dried extract (DE)) were used. Solutions of drone brood were compared in terms of testosterone, protein, total phenolic content, and antioxidant activity. The stallion semen was diluted with prepared drone brood solutions. The computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) method was employed to evaluate the movement characteristics of the diluted ejaculate. To determine spermatozoa viability, the mitochondrial toxicity test (MTT) and Alamar Blue test were performed. In terms of testosterone content and antioxidant activity, a close likeness between FR and FD was found whereas DE's composition differed notably. FR had a positive effect mainly on progressive motility, but also on sperm distance and speed parameters after 2 and 3 h of incubation. On the contrary, FD and DE acted negatively, depending on increasing dose and time. For the first time, a positive dose-dependent effect of fixed drone brood on spermatozoa survival in vitro was demonstrated.

Indexed as

Cell SurvivalSpermatozoaSperm MotilityTestosteroneAnimalsAntioxidantsBeesHorsesMaleSemen AnalysisSemen PreservationAntioxidantsTestosteroneDrone broodMotilitySpermatozoaStallionTestosteroneViability

Identifiers

PMID38772999
PMCPMC11286683

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.