ArticleESC heart failure2024
Association of point-of-care testing for sST2 with clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Clinical Value of NT-proBNP, sST2, and Galectin-3 in the Management of Heart Failure: From Diagnosis to Dynamic Monitoring: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A Simple and Cost-Effective Electrochemical Assay for Heart Failure Prognosis Using Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity 2‑Specific Nanobodies.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Article
- Biomarkers in Heart Failure: A Review and a Wish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Association of point-of-care testing for sST2 with clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThis study aimed to investigate the association of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) measured by point-of-care testing assay with clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure after adjusting for other predictors including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT).
methodsA total of 1726 consecutive patients hospitalized with heart failure from July 2015 to December 2021 were enrolled. Baseline serum sST2 concentrations were measured by immunofluorescence assay. Primary endpoint event was the composite of all-cause death, heart transplantation, or left ventricular assist device.
resultsDuring the median follow-up duration of 682 days, 434 patients (25.1%) suffered from primary endpoint events. Baseline sST2 remained an independent predictor of the primary endpoint event in patients hospitalized with heart failure after adjusting for other predictors including NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT [per log (unit) increase, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval) (CI): 1.20 (1.09, 1.32), P < 0.001]. And baseline sST2 had a better prognostic value for patients with chronic decompensated heart failure [per log (unit) increase, adjusted HR (95% CI): 1.19 (1.07, 1.31)] than for those with acute new onset heart failure [per log (unit) increase, adjusted HR (95% CI): 1.28 (0.94, 1.75), P value for interaction <0.001], as well as a better prognostic value for patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I-II [per log (unit) increase, adjusted HR (95% CI): 1.67 (1.11, 2.52)] than for those with NYHA functional class III-IV [per log (unit) increase, adjusted HR (95% CI): 1.18 (1.07, 1.31), P value for interaction <0.001]. Baseline sST2 was also a good predictor of the primary endpoint event in patients hospitalized with heart failure at 1 month, 3 months, 1 year and 2 years (area under the curve: 0.789, 0.775, 0.736 and 0.733, respectively), and the best cut-off values were 27.2 ng/ml, 27.1 ng/ml, 27.1 ng/ml and 25.1 ng/ml, respectively. Furthermore, baseline sST2 could provide additional prognostic value when added to baseline NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT (all P values <0.05). According to the category of elevated biomarkers (including NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, and sST2), patients with three elevated biomarkers had a higher risk of the primary endpoint event compared with those with one or two elevated biomarkers (all P values <0.05).
conclusionsBaseline sST2 remained an independent predictor of adverse events after adjusting for other predictors including NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT, particularly in patients with chronic decompensated heart failure and NYHA functional class I-II. And in the basis of baseline NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT, adding baseline sST2 could provide additional prognostic value for patients hospitalized with heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.