Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38779123›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational internal medicine2024

Development and status quo of digestive endoscopy in China: An analysis based on the national census in 2013 and 2020.

Yunfei Jiao, Zhiyuan Cheng, Ye Gao, Tianjiao Wang, Lei Xin, Han Lin, Mengxi Cai, Xudong Ma, Zhaoshen Li, Luowei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yunfei JiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Zhiyuan ChengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Ye GaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Tianjiao WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Lei XinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Han LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Mengxi CaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Xudong MaDepartment of Medical Quality, Medical and Health Administration, National Health Commission of China, Beijing 100044, China.
Zhaoshen LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6294-7721
Luowei WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6647-786X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Technique and practice of digestive endoscopy are undergoing speedy development all over the world. This study aimed to evaluate its status quo and development in China. Methods: All hospitals performing digestive endoscopy in mainland China participated in the national census in 2013 and 2020. Retrospective data of hospitals, endoscopists, volumes, and qualities were collected via an online structured questionnaire, and its accuracy and rationality were verified by logical tests and manual reviews. Data from other countries were used to compare with that of China. Results: From 2012 to 2019, the number of hospitals performing digestive endoscopy increased from 6,128 to 7,470 (1.22-fold), in which primary healthcare played a minor role. The median hospitals per 100,000 inhabitants per provincial region increased from 0.49 (IQR, 0.39-0.57) to 0.55 (IQR, 0.49-0.63). The endoscopists increased from 26,203 to 39,638 (1.51-fold), but their average workload even expanded. Overall volume increased from 28.8 million to 44.5 million (1.55-fold), and most types of endoscopic procedures recorded a high growth rate. Contrastingly, the specific utilization rates were low and paled in comparison with some developed countries. Nationwide, regional utilization rates showed a significant correlation with GDP per capita ( Conclusions: Impressive progress has been made in digestive endoscopy with rapidly expanding economy in China. However, primary healthcare, utilization rates, and income-related inequality of regional services were needed to be improved to promote public health better.

Indexed as

Chinadigestive endoscopynational censusquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID38779123
PMCPMC11107185

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.