Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38780942›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Prenatal Exposure to Chemical Mixtures and Metabolic Syndrome Risk in Children.

Nuria Güil-Oumrait, Nikos Stratakis, Léa Maitre, Augusto Anguita-Ruiz, Jose Urquiza, Lorenzo Fabbri, Xavier Basagaña, Barbara Heude, Line Småstuen Haug, Amrit Kaur Sakhi and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of exposure to endocrine disruptors and energy expenditure in mice.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Nuria Güil-OumraitBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Nikos StratakisBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Léa MaitreBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Augusto Anguita-RuizBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Jose UrquizaBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Lorenzo FabbriBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier BasagañaBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Barbara HeudeUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), National Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE), Center for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Paris, France.
Line Småstuen HaugDepartment of Food Safety, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Amrit Kaur SakhiDepartment of Food Safety, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Nina IszattDivision of Climate and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Hector C KeunCancer Metabolism & Systems Toxicology Group, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom.
John WrightBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Leda ChatziDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Marina VafeiadiDepartment of Social Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Mariona BustamanteBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Regina GrazulevicieneDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Sandra AndrušaityteDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Rémy SlamaDepartment of Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Diseases, Institute for Advanced Biosciences (IAB; INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR 5309), Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Rosemary McEachanBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Maribel CasasBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Martine VrijheidBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prenatal exposure to ubiquitous endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) may increase the risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in children, but few studies have studied chemical mixtures or explored underlying protein and metabolic signatures. Objective: To investigate associations of prenatal exposure to EDC mixtures with MetS risk score in children and identify associated proteins and metabolites. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, birth cohort study used data collected between April 1, 2003, and February 26, 2016, from the Human Early Life Exposome cohort based in France, Greece, Lithuania, Norway, Spain, and the UK. Eligible participants included mother-child pairs with measured prenatal EDC exposures and complete data on childhood MetS risk factors, proteins, and metabolites. Data were analyzed between October 2022 and July 2023. Exposures: Nine metals, 3 organochlorine pesticides, 5 polychlorinated biphenyls, 2 polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), 5 perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), 10 phthalate metabolites, 3 phenols, 4 parabens, and 4 organophosphate pesticide metabolites measured in urine and blood samples collected during pregnancy. Main Outcomes and Measures: At 6 to 11 years of age, a composite MetS risk score was constructed using z scores of waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and insulin levels. Childhood levels of 44 urinary metabolites, 177 serum metabolites, and 35 plasma proteins were quantified using targeted methods. Associations were assessed using bayesian weighted quantile sum regressions applied to mixtures for each chemical group. Results: The study included 1134 mothers (mean [SD] age at birth, 30.7 [4.9] years) and their children (mean [SD] age, 7.8 [1.5] years; 617 male children [54.4%] and 517 female children [45.6%]; mean [SD] MetS risk score, -0.1 [2.3]). MetS score increased per 1-quartile increase of the mixture for metals (β = 0.44; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.30 to 0.59), organochlorine pesticides (β = 0.22; 95% CrI, 0.15 to 0.29), PBDEs (β = 0.17; 95% CrI, 0.06 to 0.27), and PFAS (β = 0.19; 95% CrI, 0.14 to 0.24). High-molecular weight phthalate mixtures (β = -0.07; 95% CrI, -0.10 to -0.04) and low-molecular weight phthalate mixtures (β = -0.13; 95% CrI, -0.18 to -0.08) were associated with a decreased MetS score. Most EDC mixtures were associated with elevated proinflammatory proteins, amino acids, and altered glycerophospholipids, which in turn were associated with increased MetS score. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study suggests that prenatal exposure to EDC mixtures may be associated with adverse metabolic health in children. Given the pervasive nature of EDCs and the increase in MetS, these findings hold substantial public health implications.

Indexed as

Endocrine DisruptorsMetabolic SyndromePrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAdultBirth CohortChildCohort StudiesEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleHumansMaleMaternal ExposurePregnancyRisk FactorsEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID38780942
PMCPMC11117089

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.