Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38783233›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Public perspectives on COVID-19 public health and social measures in Japan and the United Kingdom: a qualitative study.

Saki Kawamitsu, Tin Zar Win, Su Myat Han, Tomoka Nakamura, Melissa Jogie, Chris Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saki KawamitsuSchool of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Tin Zar WinSchool of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Su Myat HanSchool of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Tomoka NakamuraSchool of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Melissa JogieUniversity of Roehampton, London, UK.
Chris SmithSchool of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan. christopher.smith@lshtm.ac.uk.

Funding

British Academy Ref: COVG7210041KAKENHI 22K18104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, was one of the greatest modern public health crises that the world has faced. Countries undertook sweeping public health and social measures (PHSM); including environmental actions such as disinfection and ventilation; surveillance and response, such as contact tracing and quarantine; physical, such as crowd control; and restrictions on travel. This study focuses on the public perceptions of PHSM in two countries, Japan and the United Kingdom (UK) as examples of high-income countries that adopted different measures over the course of the pandemic.

methodsThis study was conducted between November 2021 and February 2022, a period in which the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 was predominant. Fourteen online focus group discussions were conducted in each country. Overall, 106 total participants (50 from the UK and 56 from Japan) participated in 23 focus groups (11 in the UK and 12 in Japan) with an average of three to six participants per group. Both countries were compared using a thematic analysis method.

resultsBoth countries' participants agreed that vaccination was an effective measure. However, they did not favor mandatory vaccination policies. Working from home was well accepted by both sides, but they reported that schools should have continued to be opened as before COVID-19. Both sides of participants expressed that temperature testing alone in indoor facilities was ineffective as a COVID-19 control measure. There were contrasting views on face covering rules in public spaces, international and domestic movement restrictions. High acceptance of mask-wearing was reflective of Japanese customs, while it was accepted as a strong recommendation for participants in the UK. Japanese participants favored quarantine for international travel, while the UK participants supported banning non-essential travel.

conclusionSimilar and contrasting views on PHSM against COVID-19 between Japan and the UK demonstrated how policies in controlling an epidemic should be tailored by country with respect to its norms, cultures, economic and disease burden. Our findings may guide how policy makers can engage with the public through effective health communication and consider regulations that are aligned with the public's views and capacities in changing their behavior for future pandemic preparedness.

Indexed as

COVID-19Focus GroupsPublic HealthPublic OpinionQualitative ResearchAdultAgedFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United KingdomYoung AdultCOVID-19EnglandFocus groupsJapanPandemic preparednessPublic health and social measuresSARS-CoV-2United Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID38783233
PMCPMC11118899

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.