ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2024
Establishment of intervertebral disc degeneration models; A review of the currently used models.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforaminal intradiscal steroid injection versus transforaminal epidural steroid injection for chronic discogenic low back pain with active discopathy: a randomized controlled trial protocol.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Does ginsenoside Rg1 promote intervertebral disc repair? An experimental study insights into ferroptosis mechanism.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Exploring the causal relationships between spondyloarthritis/ankylosing spondylitis and intervertebral disc degeneration: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Mechanism-guided biomaterial strategies for intervertebral disc degeneration: Pathological heterogeneity, functional classification, and translational perspectives.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the frequent causes of low back pain is intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD), which is followed by discogenic pain. Some significant risk factors that have been linked to the onset and progression of IDD include age, mechanical imbalance, changes in nutrition and inflammation. According to recent studies, five types of animal models are established for producing IDD: the spontaneous models, the puncture models, the biomechanical models, the chemical models and the hybrid models. These models are crucial in studying and understanding IDD's natural history and identifying potential treatment targets for IDD. In our study, we'll talk about the technical aspects of these models, the time between model establishment and the apparition of observable degradation, and their potential in various research. Each animal model should be compared to the human natural IDD pathogenesis to guide future research efforts in this area. By improving knowledge and appropriate application of various animal models, we seek to raise awareness of this illness and further translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.