ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Clinical Validation of a Machine-Learned, Point-of-Care System to IDENTIFY Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Disease.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Utility of a novel point-of-care test in detecting coronary artery disease following negative nuclear testing: a case series.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many clinical studies have shown wide performance variation in tests to identify coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has been identified as an effective rule-out test but is not widely available in the USA, particularly so in rural areas. Patients in rural areas are underserved in the healthcare system as compared to urban areas, rendering it a priority population to target with highly accessible diagnostics. We previously developed a machine-learned algorithm to identify the presence of CAD (defined by functional significance) in patients with symptoms without the use of radiation or stress. The algorithm requires 215 s temporally synchronized photoplethysmographic and orthogonal voltage gradient signals acquired at rest. The purpose of the present work is to validate the performance of the algorithm in a frozen state (i.e., no retraining) in a large, blinded dataset from the IDENTIFY trial. IDENTIFY is a multicenter, selectively blinded, non-randomized, prospective, repository study to acquire signals with paired metadata from subjects with symptoms indicative of CAD within seven days prior to either left heart catheterization or CCTA. The algorithm's sensitivity and specificity were validated using a set of unseen patient signals (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.