Evidence mapPaperPMID 38786348Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Assessment of Calcaneal Spongy Bone Magnetic Resonance Characteristics in Women: A Comparison between Measures Obtained at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T.

Silvia Capuani, Alessandra Maiuro, Emiliano Giampà, Marco Montuori, Viviana Varrucciu, Gisela E Hagberg, Vincenzo Vinicola, Sergio Colonna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Silvia CapuaniCNR-ISC c/o Physics Department, "Sapienza" University of Rome, P.zle Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7863-1801
Alessandra MaiuroCNR-ISC c/o Physics Department, "Sapienza" University of Rome, P.zle Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1944-0263
Emiliano GiampàRehabilitation Hospital, Santa Lucia Foundation, IRCCS Rome, Via Ardeatina 309, 00179 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7866-3558
Marco MontuoriCNR-ISC c/o Physics Department, "Sapienza" University of Rome, P.zle Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Viviana VarrucciuRadiology Department, Santa Lucia Foundation, IRCCS Rome, Via Ardeatina 309, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Gisela E HagbergHigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max-Planck-Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2176-7086
Vincenzo VinicolaRehabilitation Hospital, Santa Lucia Foundation, IRCCS Rome, Via Ardeatina 309, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Sergio ColonnaRadiology Department, Santa Lucia Foundation, IRCCS Rome, Via Ardeatina 309, 00179 Rome, Italy.

Funding

Lazio Innova Regione Lazio (Italy) FESR POR 2014-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing interest in bone tissue MRI and an even greater interest in using low-cost MR scanners. However, the characteristics of bone MRI remain to be fully defined, especially at low field strength. This study aimed to characterize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), T

methodsThirty-two women in total underwent an MR-imaging investigation of the calcaneus at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T. MR-spectroscopy was performed at 3.0 T to assess the fat/water ratio. SNR, T

resultsSNR increase depends on the magnetic field strength, acquisition sequence, and calcaneal location. T

conclusionThe results have implications for the possible use of relaxation vs. lipid/water marrow content for bone quality assessment and the development of quantitative MRI diagnostics at low field strength.

Indexed as

bone marrow fathigh magnetic fieldlow magnetic fieldMRIspongy bone

Identifiers

PMID38786348
PMCPMC11119204

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.