Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38790937›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2024

Transplant Eligible and Ineligible Elderly Patients with AML-A Genomic Approach and Next Generation Questions.

Paul Sackstein, Alexis Williams, Rachel Zemel, Jennifer A Marks, Anne S Renteria, Gustavo Rivero

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul SacksteinLombardi Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3786-6126
Alexis WilliamsDepartment of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Rachel ZemelLombardi Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3942-7285
Jennifer A MarksLombardi Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8592-9892
Anne S RenteriaLombardi Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Gustavo RiveroLombardi Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of elderly patients diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is complicated by high relapse risk and comorbidities that often preclude access to allogeneic hematopoietic cellular transplantation (allo-HCT). In recent years, fast-paced FDA drug approval has reshaped the therapeutic landscape, with modest, albeit promising improvement in survival. Still, AML outcomes in elderly patients remain unacceptably unfavorable highlighting the need for better understanding of disease biology and tailored strategies. In this review, we discuss recent modifications suggested by European Leukemia Network 2022 (ELN-2022) risk stratification and review recent aging cell biology advances with the discussion of four AML cases. While an older age, >60 years, does not constitute an absolute contraindication for allo-HCT, the careful patient selection based on a detailed and multidisciplinary risk stratification cannot be overemphasized.

Indexed as

acute myelogenous leukemiaallogeneic HCTelderlypathogenic variantsrelapseremission induction

Identifiers

PMID38790937
PMCPMC11117792

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.