Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38791665›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

A Review of the Rumen Microbiota and the Different Molecular Techniques Used to Identify Microorganisms Found in the Rumen Fluid of Ruminants.

Éder Bruno Rebelo da Silva, Jamile Andréa Rodrigues da Silva, Welligton Conceição da Silva, Tatiane Silva Belo, Carlos Eduardo Lima Sousa, Maria Roseane Pereira Dos Santos, Kedson Alessandri Lobo Neves, Thomaz Cyro Guimarães de Carvalho Rodrigues, Raimundo Nonato Colares Camargo-Júnior, José de Brito Lourenço-Júnior

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Éder Bruno Rebelo da SilvaPostgraduate Program in Animal Science (PPGCAN), Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Para (UFPA), Castanhal 68746-360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2964-8471
Jamile Andréa Rodrigues da SilvaInstitute of Animal Health and Production, Federal Rural University of the Amazônia (UFRA), Belem 66077-830, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6400-6925
Welligton Conceição da SilvaPostgraduate Program in Animal Science (PPGCAN), Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Para (UFPA), Castanhal 68746-360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9287-0465
Tatiane Silva BeloDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University Center of the Amazon (UNAMA), Santarém 68010-200, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0515-6640
Carlos Eduardo Lima SousaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University Center of the Amazon (UNAMA), Santarém 68010-200, Brazil.
Maria Roseane Pereira Dos SantosInstitute of Engineering and Geosciences, Federal University of Western Pará (UFOPA), Santarém 68040-255, Brazil.
Kedson Alessandri Lobo NevesInstitute of Animal Science, Federal University of Western Pará (UFOPA), Santarém 68040-255, Brazil.
Thomaz Cyro Guimarães de Carvalho RodriguesPostgraduate Program in Animal Science (PPGCAN), Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Para (UFPA), Castanhal 68746-360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7874-4937
Raimundo Nonato Colares Camargo-JúniorPostgraduate Program in Animal Science (PPGCAN), Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Para (UFPA), Castanhal 68746-360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2362-3625
José de Brito Lourenço-JúniorPostgraduate Program in Animal Science (PPGCAN), Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Para (UFPA), Castanhal 68746-360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6441-4577

Funding

José de Brito Lourenço-Junior 02/2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variations in environments, including climate, diet, and agricultural practices, significantly impact the composition and microbial activity. A profound understanding of these adaptations allows for the improvement of nutrition and ruminant production. Therefore, this review aims to compile data from the literature on the rumen microbiota and molecular techniques for identifying the different types of microorganisms from the rumen fluid of ruminants. Analyzing the literature on rumen microbiology in different ruminants is complex due to microbial interactions, influenced by the environment and nutrition of these animals. In addition, it is worth noting that the genera of protozoa and fungi most evident in the studies used in this review on the microbiology of rumen fluid were

Indexed as

environmental variationsmicrobial interactionsnutrition improvement

Identifiers

PMID38791665
PMCPMC11117383

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.