Secreted Metabolites from

Dina Cruickshank, Debby E Hamilton, Ifeanyi Iloba, Gitte S Jensen

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Wound Healing: Molecular Mechanisms, Antimicrobial Peptides, and Emerging Technologies in Regenerative Medicine.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
Review

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dina CruickshankNIS Labs, 807 St. George St., Port Dover, ON N0A 1N0, Canada.

Debby E HamiltonResearched Nutritionals, P.O. Box 224, Los Olivos, CA 93441, USA.

Ifeanyi IlobaNIS Labs, 1437 Esplanade, Klamath Falls, OR 97601, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9179-8369

Gitte S JensenNIS Labs, 1437 Esplanade, Klamath Falls, OR 97601, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9497-1750

Funding

Researched Nutritionals not applicable

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms are hardy, adaptable colonies, evading immune recognition while triggering and sustaining inflammation. The goals for this study were to present a method for testing the immunogenicity of secreted metabolites from pathogenic biofilm and to document whether biofilm treated with a nutraceutical enzyme and botanical blend (NEBB) showed evidence of reprogrammed bacterial metabolism, potentially becoming more recognizable to the immune system. We screened immune-modulating properties of metabolites from established biofilm from

Indexed as

cytokinesimmune activationinflammationinterleukin-10interleukin-1βinterleukin-6macrophage inflammatory protein-1-alphapersister cellstumor necrosis factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID38792820

DOI10.3390/microorganisms12050991

PMCPMC11124038

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.