ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024
Clearing the Fog: A Scoping Literature Review on the Ethical Issues Surrounding Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Devices.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Medical Devices for Personalized Health Care Solutions: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in public health: a systematic review on technological efficacy, ethical dilemmas, and governance pathways.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Ethical, legal, and social issues of AI use in emergency healthcare: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Ethical Responsibility in Medical AI: A Semi-Systematic Thematic Review and Multilevel Governance Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Best practices and challenges in executing large scale pilots for eHealth deployment and managing innovation: the GATEKEEPER experience.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- The Mediating Role of AI Ethics Awareness Between AI Attitudes and AI Utilization: A Multisite Cross-Sectional Study of Saudi Nursing Students.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Exploring patient and clinician opinions, perspectives and acceptance of the use of artificial intelligence in the histological diagnosis of prostate cancer.BJUI compass · 2025Article
- Advancing genome-based precision medicine: a review on machine learning applications for rare genetic disorders.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- [Research on interdisciplinary issues of artificial intelligence medical devices].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Review
- Antibiotics and Artificial Intelligence: Clinical Considerations on a Rapidly Evolving Landscape.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025Article
- An Effective Methodology for Diabetes Prediction in the Case of Class Imbalance.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Repositioning intellectual disability in the ethics of digital mental health technologies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing Molecular Design for Innovative Therapeutic Applications through Artificial Intelligence.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Use of Contact Tracing Technologies for Infection Prevention and Control Purposes in Nosocomial Settings: A Systematic Literature Review.Infectious disease reports · 2024Review
- Ethical implications in using robots among older adults living with dementia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of AI in healthcare has sparked much debate among philosophers, ethicists, regulators and policymakers who raised concerns about the implications of such technologies. The presented scoping review captures the progression of the ethical and legal debate and the proposed ethical frameworks available concerning the use of AI-based medical technologies, capturing key themes across a wide range of medical contexts. The ethical dimensions are synthesised in order to produce a coherent ethical framework for AI-based medical technologies, highlighting how transparency, accountability, confidentiality, autonomy, trust and fairness are the top six recurrent ethical issues. The literature also highlighted how it is essential to increase ethical awareness through interdisciplinary research, such that researchers, AI developers and regulators have the necessary education/competence or networks and tools to ensure proper consideration of ethical matters in the conception and design of new AI technologies and their norms. Interdisciplinarity throughout research, regulation and implementation will help ensure AI-based medical devices are ethical, clinically effective and safe. Achieving these goals will facilitate successful translation of AI into healthcare systems, which currently is lagging behind other sectors, to ensure timely achievement of health benefits to patients and the public.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.