Evidence mapPaperPMID 38793096Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024

Analysis of Missingness Scenarios for Observational Health Data.

Alireza Zamanian, Henrik von Kleist, Octavia-Andreea Ciora, Marta Piperno, Gino Lancho, Narges Ahmidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cafe: Improved Federated Data Imputation by Leveraging Missing Data Heterogeneity.IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alireza ZamanianDepartment of Computer Science, TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7412-6755
Henrik von KleistDepartment of Computer Science, TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Munich, Germany.
Octavia-Andreea CioraFraunhofer Institute for Cognitive Systems IKS, 80686 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9399-781X
Marta PipernoFraunhofer Institute for Cognitive Systems IKS, 80686 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-2865-5033
Gino LanchoFraunhofer Institute for Cognitive Systems IKS, 80686 Munich, Germany.
Narges AhmidiFraunhofer Institute for Cognitive Systems IKS, 80686 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0983-9964

Funding

Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wirtschaft, Landesentwicklung und Energie
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the extensive literature on missing data theory and cautionary articles emphasizing the importance of realistic analysis for healthcare data, a critical gap persists in incorporating domain knowledge into the missing data methods. In this paper, we argue that the remedy is to identify the key scenarios that lead to data missingness and investigate their theoretical implications. Based on this proposal, we first introduce an analysis framework where we investigate how different observation agents, such as physicians, influence the data availability and then scrutinize each scenario with respect to the steps in the missing data analysis. We apply this framework to the case study of observational data in healthcare facilities. We identify ten fundamental missingness scenarios and show how they influence the identification step for missing data graphical models, inverse probability weighting estimation, and exponential tilting sensitivity analysis. To emphasize how domain-informed analysis can improve method reliability, we conduct simulation studies under the influence of various missingness scenarios. We compare the results of three common methods in medical data analysis: complete-case analysis, Missforest imputation, and inverse probability weighting estimation. The experiments are conducted for two objectives: variable mean estimation and classification accuracy. We advocate for our analysis approach as a reference for the observational health data analysis. Beyond that, we also posit that the proposed analysis framework is applicable to other medical domains.

Indexed as

missing data analysismissing data assumptionsmissingness distribution shiftmissingness scenariosobservational health data

Identifiers

PMID38793096
PMCPMC11122060

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.