Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38794795›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2024

Mechanical control of antigen detection and discrimination by T and B cell receptors.

Jhordan Rogers, Anna T Bajur, Khalid Salaita, Katelyn M Spillane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. T cell engagers in autoimmune diseases.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antigen mobility regulates the dynamics and precision of antigen capture in the B cell immune synapse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Biophysics of immune cell signaling.Biophysical journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jhordan RogersDepartment of Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Anna T BajurDepartment of Physics, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Khalid SalaitaDepartment of Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: k.salaita@emory.edu.
Katelyn M SpillaneDepartment of Physics, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: k.spillane@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Equipment Supplement: Cell sorting flow cytometry to support the BTDDRM1GM145394 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Khalid S. Salaita · 2023 to 2026
$5.6M
Mechano-ID for tagging immune cellsR01AI172452 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Khalid S. Salaita · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI172452NIGMS NIH HHS RM1 GM145394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adaptive immune response is orchestrated by just two cell types, T cells and B cells. Both cells possess the remarkable ability to recognize virtually any antigen through their respective antigen receptors-the T cell receptor (TCR) and B cell receptor (BCR). Despite extensive investigations into the biochemical signaling events triggered by antigen recognition in these cells, our ability to predict or control the outcome of T and B cell activation remains elusive. This challenge is compounded by the sensitivity of T and B cells to the biophysical properties of antigens and the cells presenting them-a phenomenon we are just beginning to understand. Recent insights underscore the central role of mechanical forces in this process, governing the conformation, signaling activity, and spatial organization of TCRs and BCRs within the cell membrane, ultimately eliciting distinct cellular responses. Traditionally, T cells and B cells have been studied independently, with researchers working in parallel to decipher the mechanisms of activation. While these investigations have unveiled many overlaps in how these cell types sense and respond to antigens, notable differences exist. To fully grasp their biology and harness it for therapeutic purposes, these distinctions must be considered. This review compares and contrasts the TCR and BCR, placing emphasis on the role of mechanical force in regulating the activity of both receptors to shape cellular and humoral adaptive immune responses.

Indexed as

AntigensReceptors, Antigen, B-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-CellAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaB-LymphocytesHumansMechanical PhenomenaT-LymphocytesAntigensReceptors, Antigen, B-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID38794795
PMCPMC11331051

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.