Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38795365›Full record

ReviewEndocrine reviews2024

Current Challenges and Future Directions in the Assessment of Glucocorticoid Status.

Sophie A Clarke, Pei Chia Eng, Alexander N Comninos, Katharine Lazarus, Sirazum Choudhury, Christie Tsang, Karim Meeran, Tricia M Tan, Waljit S Dhillo, Ali Abbara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sophie A ClarkeSection of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 ONN, UK.
Pei Chia EngSection of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 ONN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4172-1344
Alexander N ComninosSection of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 ONN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7104-2297
Katharine LazarusSection of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 ONN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0758-7839
Sirazum ChoudhurySection of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 ONN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2429-005X
Christie TsangSection of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 ONN, UK.
Karim MeeranSection of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 ONN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7112-2756
Tricia M TanSection of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 ONN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5873-3432
Waljit S DhilloSection of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 ONN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5950-4316
Ali AbbaraSection of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 ONN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2795-5256

Funding

MRCNIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glucocorticoid (GC) hormones are secreted in a circadian and ultradian rhythm and play a critical role in maintaining physiological homeostasis, with both excess and insufficient GC associated with adverse effects on health. Current assessment of GC status is primarily clinical, often in conjunction with serum cortisol values, which may be stimulated or suppressed depending on the GC disturbance being assessed. In the setting of extreme perturbations in cortisol levels ie, markedly low or high levels, symptoms and signs of GC dysfunction may be overt. However, when disturbances in cortisol GC status values are less extreme, such as when assessing optimization of a GC replacement regimen, signs and symptoms can be more subtle or nonspecific. Current tools for assessing GC status are best suited to identifying profound disturbances but may lack sensitivity for confirming optimal GC status. Moreover, single cortisol values do not necessarily reflect an individual's GC status, as they are subject to inter- and intraindividual variation and do not take into account the pulsatile nature of cortisol secretion, variation in binding proteins, or local tissue concentrations as dictated by 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity, as well as GC receptor sensitivity. In the present review, we evaluate possible alternative methods for the assessment of GC status that do not solely rely on the measurement of circulating cortisol levels. We discuss the potential of changes in metabolomic profiles, micro RNA, gene expression, and epigenetic and other novel biomarkers such as growth differentiating factor 15 and osteocalcin, which could in the future aid in the objective classification of GC status.

Indexed as

GlucocorticoidsCircadian RhythmHumansHydrocortisoneGlucocorticoidsHydrocortisoneAddison's diseaseadrenalglucocorticoidpituitary glandsteroids

Identifiers

PMID38795365
PMCPMC11581704

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.