Evidence mapPaperPMID 38797481Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of nutrition2024

High-Moisture Extrusion of a Dietary Protein Blend Impairs In Vitro Digestion and Delays In Vivo Postprandial Plasma Amino Acid Availability in Humans.

Sam West, Alistair J Monteyne, Gráinne Whelehan, Doaa R Abdelrahman, Andrew J Murton, Tim Ja Finnigan, Giuseppina Mandalari, Catherine Booth, Peter J Wilde, Francis B Stephens and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05584358 (The Impact of the Extrusion Process During Dietary Protein Production on in Vivo Postprandial Amino Acid Availability), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05584358 nacompletednot on this map

The Impact of the Extrusion Process During Dietary Protein Production on in Vivo Postprandial Amino Acid Availability

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ExeterRan2022 to 2023Enrolled9ConditionsPostprandial Plasma Amino Acid AvailabilityArmsDry protein blend ingestion, Extruded protein blend ingestion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sam WestDepartment of Public Health and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alistair J MonteyneDepartment of Public Health and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Gráinne WhelehanDepartment of Public Health and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Doaa R AbdelrahmanDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States; Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Andrew J MurtonDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States; Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Tim Ja FinniganNew Era Foods, Hutton Rudby, Yarm, United Kingdom.
Giuseppina MandalariDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Science, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Catherine BoothQuadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Peter J WildeQuadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Francis B StephensDepartment of Public Health and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Benjamin T WallDepartment of Public Health and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom. Electronic address: b.t.wall@exeter.ac.uk.

Funding

UTMB Claude Pepper Older Americans Independence CenterP30AG024832 · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · 2005 to 2025
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndustrial processing can alter the structural complexity of dietary proteins and, potentially, their digestion and absorption upon ingestion. High-moisture extrusion (HME), a common processing method used to produce meat alternative products, affects in vitro digestion, but human data are lacking. We hypothesized that HME of a mycoprotein/pea protein blend would impair in vitro digestion and in vivo postprandial plasma amino acid availability.

methodsIn Study A, 9 healthy volunteers completed 2 experimental trials in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. Participants consumed a beverage containing 25 g protein from a "dry" blend (CON) of mycoprotein/pea protein (39%/61%) or an HME content-matched blend (EXT). Arterialized venous blood samples were collected in the postabsorptive state and regularly over a 5-h postprandial period to assess plasma amino acid concentrations. In Study B, in vitro digestibility of the 2 beverages were assessed using bicinchoninic acid assay and optical fluorescence microscopy at baseline and during and following gastric and intestinal digestion using the INFOGEST model of digestion.

resultsProtein ingestion increased plasma total, essential (EAA), and branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) concentrations (time effect, P < 0.0001) but more rapidly and to a greater magnitude in the CON compared with the EXT condition (condition × time interaction, P < 0.0001). This resulted in greater plasma availability of EAA and BCAA concentrations during the early postprandial period (0-150 min). These data were corroborated by the in vitro approach, which showed greater protein availability in the CON (2150 ± 129 mg/mL) compared with the EXT (590 ± 41 mg/mL) condition during the gastric phase. Fluorescence microscopy revealed clear structural differences between the 2 conditions.

conclusionsThese data demonstrate that HME delays in vivo plasma amino acid availability following ingestion of a mycoprotein/pea protein blend. This is likely due to impaired gastric phase digestion as a result of HME-induced aggregate formation in the pea protein. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05584358.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsCross-Over StudiesDietary ProteinsDigestionPostprandial PeriodAdultBiological AvailabilityDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFood HandlingHumansMalePea ProteinsYoung AdultAmino AcidsDietary ProteinsPea Proteinsamino acidsbioavailabilitydigestionextrusionINFOGESTmycoproteinpea protein

Identifiers

PMID38797481
PMCPMC11282500

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.