Evidence mapPaperPMID 38798339Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

Primate V2 Receptive Fields Derived from Anatomically Identified Large-Scale V1 Inputs.

Mahlega S Hassanpour, Sam Merlin, Frederick Federer, Qasim Zaidi, Alessandra Angelucci

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mahlega S HassanpourDept. of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Moran Eye Institute, University of Utah.
Sam MerlinDept. of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Moran Eye Institute, University of Utah.
Frederick FedererDept. of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Moran Eye Institute, University of Utah.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-865X
Qasim ZaidiGraduate Center for Vision Research, State University of New York, College of Optometry.ORCID 0000-0002-1300- 2879
Alessandra AngelucciDept. of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Moran Eye Institute, University of Utah.ORCID 0000-0002-1957-2231

Funding

University of Utah Core Vision Research GrantP30EY014800 · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · 2005 to 2025
$1.4M
Anatomical and functional organization of inter-areal feedback circuits in the visual cortex, and their impact on neuronal responsesR01EY026812 · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · 2025 to 2025
$363k
Vision Research Training Grant at the University of UtahT32EY024234 · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · 2025 to 2025
$161k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014800NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019743NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026812NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031959NEI NIH HHS R21 EY035085NEI NIH HHS T32 EY024234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the primate visual system, visual object recognition involves a series of cortical areas arranged hierarchically along the ventral visual pathway. As information flows through this hierarchy, neurons become progressively tuned to more complex image features. The circuit mechanisms and computations underlying the increasing complexity of these receptive fields (RFs) remain unidentified. To understand how this complexity emerges in the secondary visual area (V2), we investigated the functional organization of inputs from the primary visual cortex (V1) to V2 by combining retrograde anatomical tracing of these inputs with functional imaging of feature maps in macaque monkey V1 and V2. We found that V1 neurons sending inputs to single V2 orientation columns have a broad range of preferred orientations, but are strongly biased towards the orientation represented at the injected V2 site. For each V2 site, we then constructed a feedforward model based on the linear combination of its anatomically-identified large-scale V1 inputs, and studied the response proprieties of the generated V2 RFs. We found that V2 RFs derived from the linear feedforward model were either elongated versions of V1 filters or had spatially complex structures. These modeled RFs predicted V2 neuron responses to oriented grating stimuli with high accuracy. Remarkably, this simple model also explained the greater selectivity to naturalistic textures of V2 cells compared to their V1 input cells. Our results demonstrate that simple linear combinations of feedforward inputs can account for the orientation selectivity and texture sensitivity of V2 RFs.

Identifiers

PMID38798339
PMCPMC11118708

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.