ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024
Beyond BCMA: the next wave of CAR T cell therapy in multiple myeloma.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of CD38-directed CAR-T cell therapy for multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Prediagnostic opioid use and survival in multiple myeloma: a nationwide register-based study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Evaluation of CAR-T Cell Gene Therapy, Tracing its Revolutionary Clinical Breakthroughs and Advancements Towards Next-Generation Engineering.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Non-coding RNAs as predictive factors of oncological outcomes in plasma cell myeloma.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Emerging Concepts in Immuno-Oncology: Insights from Natural Language Processing-Driven Co-Occurrence Analysis.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Targets for CAR Therapy in Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- BCMA-targeted therapies in multiple myeloma: advances, challenges and future prospects.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- The Evolving Landscape in Multiple Myeloma: From Risk Stratification to T Cell-Directed Advanced Therapies.Cancers · 2025Review
- Perspectives on Talquetamab and its Utility in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Safety, Efficacy and Place in Therapy.Cancer management and research · 2025Review
- Measurable Residual Disease Testing in Multiple Myeloma Following T-Cell Redirecting Therapies.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has transformed the treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The current Food and Drug Administration approved CAR T cell therapies idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel both target B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), which is expressed on the surface of malignant plasma cells. Despite deep initial responses in most patients, relapse after anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy is common. Investigations of acquired resistance to anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy are underway. Meanwhile, other viable antigenic targets are being pursued, including G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D), signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 7 (SLAMF7), and CD38, among others. CAR T cells targeting these antigens, alone or in combination with anti-BCMA approaches, appear to be highly promising as they move from preclinical studies to early phase clinical trials. This review summarizes the current data with novel CAR T cell targets beyond BCMA that have the potential to enter the treatment landscape in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.