Evidence mapPaperPMID 38801344Full record

ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2024

Ageing, microbes and health.

Paul W O'Toole

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The Aging Gut-Brain Axis: Effects of Dietary Polyphenols and Metal Exposure.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Microbes Saving Lives and Reducing Suffering.Microbial biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Ageing, microbes and health.Microbial biotechnology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Paul W O'TooleSchool of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5377-0824

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Innovative Europe 101079777HORIZON EUROPE Innovative Europe 101083671Science Foundation Ireland 12/RC/2273_P2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human gut microbiome is a modifier of the risk for many non-communicable diseases throughout the lifespan. In ageing, the effect of the microbiome appears to be more pronounced because of the lower physiological reserve. Microbial metabolites and other bioactive products act upon some of the key physiological processes involved in the Hallmarks of Ageing. Dietary interventions that delay age-related change in the microbiome have also led to delayed onset of ageing-related health loss, and improved levels of cognitive function, inflammatory status and frailty. Cross-sectional analysis of thousands of gut microbiome datasets from around the world has identified key taxa that are depleted during accelerated health loss, and other taxa that become more abundant, but these signatures differ in some geographical regions. The key challenges for research in this area are to experimentally prove that particular species or strains directly contribute to health-related ageing outcomes, and to develop practical ways of retaining or re-administering them on a population basis. The promotion of a health-associated gut microbiome in ageing mirrors the challenge of maintaining planetary microbial ecosystems in the face of anthropogenic effects and climate change. Lessons learned from acting at the individual level can inform microbiome-targeting strategies for achieving Sustainable Development Goals at a global level.

Indexed as

AgingGastrointestinal MicrobiomeBacteriaHumans

Identifiers

PMID38801344
PMCPMC11129672

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.