Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38801424›Full record

ArticleHNO2024

[Pulsed DPOAEs in serial measurements : Combined analysis paradigm of simultaneously occurring changes in hearing thresholds and DPOAEs. German version].

Katharina Bader, Dennis Zelle, Anthony W Gummer, Ernst Dalhoff

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katharina BaderKlinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Elfriede-Aulhorn-Straße 5, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. Katharina.Bader@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Dennis ZelleSektion für Physiologische Akustik und Kommunikation, Universitäts-HNO-Klinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Anthony W GummerSektion für Physiologische Akustik und Kommunikation, Universitäts-HNO-Klinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Ernst DalhoffSektion für Physiologische Akustik und Kommunikation, Universitäts-HNO-Klinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, there is no consensus on how to standardize the assessment of ototoxicity in serial measurements. For the diagnosis of damage to the cochlear amplifier, measurement methods are required that have the highest possible test-retest reliability and validity for detecting persistent damage. Estimated distortion-product thresholds (L MATERIALS AND

methodsHearing thresholds were estimated objectively using L

resultsL

conclusionIt is expected that an analysis paradigm based on a combination of L

Indexed as

Auditory ThresholdOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousSensitivity and SpecificityAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHearing LossHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultCochlea amplifierOtotoxicityTest-retest reliabilityTime domain analysis

Identifiers

PMID38801424
PMCPMC11339121

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.