Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38802408›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2024

Physical frailty, genetic predisposition, and incident dementia: a large prospective cohort study.

Pei-Yang Gao, Ling-Zhi Ma, Xue-Jie Wang, Bang-Sheng Wu, Yi-Ming Huang, Zhi-Bo Wang, Yan Fu, Ya-Nan Ou, Jian-Feng Feng, Wei Cheng and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pei-Yang Gao *Department of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Ling-Zhi Ma *Department of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xue-Jie Wang *Department of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Bang-Sheng WuDepartment of Neurology and National Center for Neurological Disorders, Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yi-Ming HuangDepartment of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Zhi-Bo WangInnovation Center for Neurological Disorders and Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Beijing, China.
Yan FuDepartment of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Ya-Nan OuDepartment of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Jian-Feng FengInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5987-2258
Wei ChengDepartment of Neurology and National Center for Neurological Disorders, Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1118-1743
Lan TanDepartment of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. dr.tanlan@163.com.
Jin-Tai YuDepartment of Neurology and National Center for Neurological Disorders, Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. jintai_yu@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-2532-383X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82071201National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82071997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical frailty and genetic factors are both risk factors for increased dementia; nevertheless, the joint effect remains unclear. This study aimed to investigated the long-term relationship between physical frailty, genetic risk, and dementia incidence. A total of 274,194 participants from the UK Biobank were included. We applied Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate the association between physical frailty and genetic and dementia risks. Among the participants (146,574 females [53.45%]; mean age, 57.24 years), 3,353 (1.22%) new-onset dementia events were recorded. Compared to non-frailty, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia incidence in prefrailty and frailty was 1.396 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.294-1.506, P < 0.001) and 2.304 (95% CI, 2.030-2.616, P < 0.001), respectively. Compared to non-frailty and low polygenic risk score (PRS), the HR for dementia risk was 3.908 (95% CI, 3.051-5.006, P < 0.001) for frailty and high PRS. Furthermore, among the participants, slow walking speed (HR, 1.817; 95% CI, 1.640-2.014, P < 0.001), low physical activity (HR, 1.719; 95% CI, 1.545-1.912, P < 0.001), exhaustion (HR, 1.670; 95% CI, 1.502-1.856, P < 0.001), low grip strength (HR, 1.606; 95% CI, 1.479-1.744, P < 0.001), and weight loss (HR, 1.464; 95% CI, 1.328-1.615, P < 0.001) were independently associated with dementia risk compared to non-frailty. Particularly, precise modulation for different dementia genetic risk populations can also be identified due to differences in dementia risk resulting from the constitutive pattern of frailty in different genetic risk populations. In conclusion, both physical frailty and high genetic risk are significantly associated with higher dementia risk. Early intervention to modify frailty is beneficial for achieving primary and precise prevention of dementia, especially in those at high genetic risk.

Indexed as

DementiaFrailtyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID38802408
PMCPMC11130190

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.