ArticleScientific reports2024
Exploring shared molecular signatures and regulatory mechanisms in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and inflammatory bowel disease using integrative bioinformatics analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemokines and chemokine receptors in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: pathogenic mechanisms and clinical implications.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2026Review
- Role of gut microbiota in the development of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The co-existence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has raised interest in identifying shared molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. However, the relationship between these two diseases remains unclear and effective medical treatments are still lacking. Through the bioinformatics analysis in this study, 116 shared differentially expressed genes (SDEGs) were identified between IBD and NASH datasets. GO and KEGG pathway analyses revealed significant involvement of SDEGs in apoptotic processes, cell death, defense response, cytokine and chemokine activity, and signaling pathways. Furthermore, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) identified five shared signature genes associated specifically with IBD and NASH, they were CXCL9, GIMAP2, ADAMTS5, GRAP, and PRF1. These five genes represented potential diagnostic biomarkers for distinguishing patients with diseases from healthy individuals by using two classifier algorithms and were positively related to autophagy, ferroptosis, angiogenesis, and immune checkpoint factors in the two diseases. Additionally, single-cell analysis of IBD and NASH samples highlighted the expression of regulatory genes in various immune cell subtypes, emphasizing their significance in disease pathogenesis. Our work elucidated the shared signature genes and regulatory mechanisms of IBD and NASH, which could provide new potential therapies for patients with IBD and NASH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.